District of Columbia Introduces Legislation on Data Privacy

District of Columbia Introduces Legislation on Data Privacy

New proposal creates stricter safeguards against data breaches, protects more private consumer information and enhances data security and reporting requirements.

District of Columbia Attorney General Karl A. Racine has introduced the Security Breach Protection Amendment Act of 2019, which would modernize the District's data breach law and strengthen protections for residents' personal information. 

Racine introduced the bill in response to the major data breaches that have put tens of millions of consumers, and hundreds of thousands of District residents, at risk of identity theft and other types of fraud, according to a press release.

The new legislation would expand legal protections to cover additional types of personal information, require companies that deal with personal information to implement safeguards, include additional reporting requirements for companies that suffer a data breach, and require companies that expose consumers' social security numbers to offer two years of free identity theft protection.

"Data breaches and identity theft continue to pose major threats to District residents and consumers worldwide," Racine said. "The District's current data security law does not adequately protect residents. Today's amendment will bolster the District's ability to hold companies responsible when they collect and use vast amounts of consumer data and do not protect it."

The Security Breach Protection Amendment Act of 2019, reintroduced today in the D.C. Council, strengthens District law by: 

  • Holding companies accountable for safeguarding a broader range of private information: In addition to covering social security numbers, driver’s license numbers, and credit or debit card numbers, the new proposed definition for “personal information” would also require companies to protect passport numbers, taxpayer identification numbers, military ID numbers, health information, biometric data, genetic information and DNA profiles, and health insurance information. This expanded definition takes into account new security and authentication practices and would better protect residents against identity theft. 
  • Creating security requirements for companies that handle personal information: The proposal requires companies that own, license, maintain, handle, or otherwise possess personal information to implement and maintain security safeguards against unauthorized access or use of data. 
  • Requiring companies to provide identity theft protection if they expose Social Security numbers: Companies that expose Social Security or tax identification numbers as part of a data breach would be required to provide affected District consumers with two years of free identity theft prevention services. 
  • Requiring companies to inform consumers of their rights when a data breach occurs: If a data breach occurs, companies would be required to inform consumers of their right under federal law to obtain a security freeze at no cost and information how to obtain such a freeze.

About the Author

Sydny Shepard is the Executive Editor of Campus Security & Life Safety.

If you like what you see, get more delivered to your inbox weekly.
Click here to subscribe to our free premium content.

comments powered by Disqus

Digital Edition

  • Security Today Magazine - April 2019

    April 2019

    Featuring:

    • An Iron Solution
    • Simplify, Automate and Modernize
    • Paving Safer Roads
    • Crime-busting Technology
    • Helping Those in Need

    View This Issue

  • Environmental Protection
  • Occupational Health & Safety
  • Infrastructure Solutions Group
  • School Planning & Managmenet
  • College Planning & Management
  • Campus Security & Life Safety