On The Books - A recent survey revealed 70 percent of campus threat teams are meeting once or twice a week to review current situations. With mounting job responsibilities, finding time to get together in person and discuss is difficult.

On The Books

Centralized and secure record-keeping is key for Virginia colleges

By now, most colleges have taken steps to form a threat assessment team that investigates a range of concerning behaviors and potentially dangerous situations, including threats made by students, employees, faculty and others in the community.

Threat assessment teams typically include five to 10 members and should be multi-disciplinary, including representatives from college administration, law enforcement, mental health and legal counsel. Taking on the role of a threat assessment team member is an added and important responsibility. Lessons learned reveal the key to keeping assessment teams from becoming overwhelmed is to ensure the right processes are outlined and the right tools are used.

A recent survey revealed 70 percent of campus threat teams are meeting once or twice a week to review current situations. With mounting job responsibilities, finding time to get together in person and discuss is difficult.

Several colleges in Virginia have implemented Awareity’s threat assessment, incident management and prevention services (TIPS) platform to help manage and coordinate threat team efforts, saving valuable time and resources, while improving collaboration and information sharing.

THE FIRST THING TO DO

When a threat report is received, the first task of an assessment team is to collect as much information as possible to determine the potential for risk. Threat cases require an individualized approach, and the more information gathered the better. Gathering this information may include interviewing the individuals involved, speaking with faculty and friends, reviewing social media, and/or conducting a formal law enforcement investigation. Keeping track of the steps taken during this investigation and coordinating all actions and communications between team members is where TIPS delivers valuable advantages.

No longer do assessment teams need to find a time/place for everyone to meet, but team members can easily login and document their findings and case notes, set tasks for other team members, etc. and all other team members can review the investigation and ongoing updates in real-time, rather than waiting for their next meeting.

All actions are date/time stamped, providing legal-ready documentation and accountability, while also ensuring appropriate steps are taken to most effectively intervene and prevent a situation from escalating into something much worse.

Equipping your threat assessment team with a centralized platform is critical. Lessons learned reveal how organizations often fail to connect the dots. A working platform allows all team members to search related reports involving one or more people, review previous reports, investigations and actions, and assess a more comprehensive pattern of behavior. As we learned from the tragic Virginia Tech massacre, many people observed concerning behaviors prior, but these concerns were not routed to one central place to be connected and the seriousness of the threat(s) accurately identified.

KEEPING RECORDS

Threat assessment record-keeping can be difficult because records may include sensitive information or even criminal records that do not fit into previously established conventions, like student records systems. In fact, if your campus is currently placing threat records in your student conduct or student information system (SIS), you may be inadvertently putting this information at risk to unwanted exposure and liabilities.

This common misunderstanding about where to place and maintain threat records creates a disparity with FERPA and is costing colleges in numerous ways. Not only are threat records put at risk in an SIS, some assessment team members are not putting key information into the SIS, which means other team members are not seeing all details and are unable to make the right decisions. FERPA clearly identifies “law enforcement unit” records can and should be kept separate from SIS records.

The Virginia Threat Assessment State Law Guidance also recommends threat assessment teams keep threat records separate from student records and treat them as “law enforcement unit” records. These records should only be accessible to authorized team members and personnel.

The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Workplace Violence Standard also clearly states that organizations should provide secure, “need to know” and anytime access to a centralized record keeping platform.

TIPS allows teams to be more efficient and track and document investigation notes in one place. Team members can, of course, still access SIS to locate information like class schedules or contact information, and share this information as needed within TIPS, but keeping the actual investigation details and assessment separate from your SIS is vital. Once the threat assessment process has been concluded or a resolution has been determined, for instance, suspension from campus, a summary can/should be recorded in the SIS, but all investigation prior should only be discussed between team members and documented in the secure centralized platform.

Of course, connecting the right dots means collecting all the dots first. How can threat teams ensure they are receiving information? Use of a comprehensive platform offers an anonymous incident reporting option. A TIPS reporting button is strategically placed on the campus website allowing anyone to securely report concerning behaviors. Campus threat teams can determine what types of incidents should be reported (sexual misconduct, threats to harm, weapons, drug/alcohol abuse, self-harm/suicide threats, suspicious persons).

Thomas Nelson Community College, the first Virginia community college to implement the TIPS prevention platform in 2012, had established a web-based reporting form, but the customization features available in TIPS provided significant advantages.

“Being able to determine what types of incidents could be reported and design the forms and questions based on our current procedures made the transition to TIPS simple,” said campus police chief Kelvin Maxwell. “The way in which reports from different locations and incident types could be directed to the appropriate staff, helped us ensure the right people were being notified so immediate and proactive actions could be taken.”

In addition to Maxwell, Thomas Nelson’s Threat Team also includes the vice president for Finance and Administration, Human Resources, campus police and student counseling staff. General counsel is also added to specific reports; with TIPS third-party resources law enforcement, mental health, compliance, etc. can become involved and added to individual reports in the system, if, and only when, their guidance is requested.

Campus-wide awareness and education regarding reporting of concerning behaviors is critical—all resident advisors, mental health counselors, academic advisors, faculty members, etc. need to understand how concerns should be communicated. Ongoing reminders should emphasize how everyone plays a role in keeping their campus safe and helping people in distress, whether or not a direct threat has been made.

At the beginning of the semester, Germanna Community College posted several awareness posters around campus with examples of the different behaviors to be reported.

“Students really appreciate that we are taking extra steps to involve them in safety efforts on campus,” said Pam Frederick, dean of student development at Germanna. “They really are our best eyes and ears on campus.

“TIPS allows anyone associated with the college community to come forward and anonymously share information with us,” Frederick said. “The information is immediately communicated to our team and proactively investigated so we can prevent situations from escalating.”

Once an investigation is determined to be “resolved,” it is also important to follow-up and monitor at-risk individuals. The follow up process may be as simple as checking in with the student (or parents, roommates, counselor of the individual involved) periodically and ensuring the situation is not escalating. TIPS provides a valuable reminder tool that ensures follow-up actions are taking place and no individuals slip through the cracks.

This article originally appeared in the January 2016 issue of Security Today.

Featured

  • Gaining a Competitive Edge

    Ask most companies about their future technology plans and the answers will most likely include AI. Then ask how they plan to deploy it, and that is where the responses may start to vary. Every company has unique surveillance requirements that are based on market focus, scale, scope, risk tolerance, geographic area and, of course, budget. Those factors all play a role in deciding how to configure a surveillance system, and how to effectively implement technologies like AI. Read Now

  • 6 Ways Security Awareness Training Empowers Human Risk Management

    Organizations are realizing that their greatest vulnerability often comes from within – their own people. Human error remains a significant factor in cybersecurity breaches, making it imperative for organizations to address human risk effectively. As a result, security awareness training (SAT) has emerged as a cornerstone in this endeavor because it offers a multifaceted approach to managing human risk. Read Now

  • The Stage is Set

    The security industry spans the entire globe, with manufacturers, developers and suppliers on every continent (well, almost—sorry, Antarctica). That means when regulations pop up in one area, they often have a ripple effect that impacts the entire supply chain. Recent data privacy regulations like GDPR in Europe and CPRA in California made waves when they first went into effect, forcing businesses to change the way they approach data collection and storage to continue operating in those markets. Even highly specific regulations like the U.S.’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) can have international reverberations – and this growing volume of legislation has continued to affect global supply chains in a variety of different ways. Read Now

  • Access Control Technology

    As we move swiftly toward the end of 2024, the security industry is looking at the trends in play, what might be on the horizon, and how they will impact business opportunities and projections. Read Now

Featured Cybersecurity

Webinars

New Products

  • Compact IP Video Intercom

    Viking’s X-205 Series of intercoms provide HD IP video and two-way voice communication - all wrapped up in an attractive compact chassis. 3

  • A8V MIND

    A8V MIND

    Hexagon’s Geosystems presents a portable version of its Accur8vision detection system. A rugged all-in-one solution, the A8V MIND (Mobile Intrusion Detection) is designed to provide flexible protection of critical outdoor infrastructure and objects. Hexagon’s Accur8vision is a volumetric detection system that employs LiDAR technology to safeguard entire areas. Whenever it detects movement in a specified zone, it automatically differentiates a threat from a nonthreat, and immediately notifies security staff if necessary. Person detection is carried out within a radius of 80 meters from this device. Connected remotely via a portable computer device, it enables remote surveillance and does not depend on security staff patrolling the area. 3

  • Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden Door Controls has relaunched its CV-7600 card readers in response to growing market demand for a more secure alternative to standard proximity credentials that can be easily cloned. CV-7600 readers support MIFARE DESFire EV1 & EV2 encryption technology credentials, making them virtually clone-proof and highly secure. 3