Just Why Are So Many Cyber Breaches Due to Human Error?

Often mentioned but seldom probed in the media is the biggest reason behind cybersecurity breaches – employee error. Two facts about this stand out. One is just how overwhelming employee errors are. The other is that the fault lies largely in the lap of companies themselves, not their workers.

Let’s start with a statistic. A joint study by Stanford University Professor Jeff Hancock and security firm Tessian has found that a whopping 88 percent of data breach incidents are caused by employee mistakes. Similar research by IBM Security puts the number at 95 percent.

Moreover, when a breached company finds the cause of the attack and the human culprit, the reaction is typically stern. According to Tessian, its aforementioned study, "Psychology of Human Error 2022, " one in four such employees lose their job within about a year, even though more than half of employees fall for a phishing email because the attacker impersonated a senior executive at the company.

They and surviving employees typically feel guilty and, predictably, fewer of these employees are reporting their mistakes.

This approach isn’t working. This isn’t to say that employees shouldn’t be held accountable. But after a proper lecture and probably a mandate to embrace more cybersecurity training, the focus should be on helping the employee do better in the future. Rejection helps nobody.

Ultimately, the mitigation of human error has to come from two angles – reducing opportunity and educating users. The fewer opportunities there are for an error, the less users will be tested. And the more knowledge they have, the less likely they are to make a mistake even when they face an opportunity to do so.

Most companies have done a pretty good job on the reduction of opportunity by typically investing time and money into bolstering their cyber defenses and supporting technology. They typically have a long list of anti-virus solutions, software and operating system patches, virtual private networks and vulnerability scanning across devices. Encryption is also becoming common.

On the cybersecurity education front, however, most enterprises are not doing a good job. Employees typically get a day or two of training when they are hired and thereafter some sort of brush-up once a year. This isn’t enough because many employees forget at least some of what they learn after a few months and, regardless, all employees need additional help with cybersecurity because it’s constantly changing. According to the Advanced Computing Systems Association, companies should host cybersecurity training every four to six months, preferably using interactive examples and videos.

At this juncture, unfortunately, too many employees remain insufficiently informed about cybersecurity, in part because security executives and managers put a higher priority on amassing technology. In particular, many companies prioritize having a broad array of complex cybersecurity tools, even though this may be counterproductive. According to IBM Security, security teams are overwhelmed by alerts and the growing number of tools they must manage. Big Blue estimates that enterprises use as many as different security products from roughly 40 vendors, which essentially boils down to building a clear picture with pieces from 80 separate puzzles.

Another indication that security executive may be misplacing their priorities is the continued reluctance among many companies to adopt incident response plans consistently across their organizations. Another study by IBM Security, with the help of Ponemon Institute, found that a whopping 74 percent of security and IT pros surveyed in 11 global markets didn't feel this was necessary. This seems to be a mistake given that IRPs are designed to expedite the response to an organizational breach to mitigate reputational damage and cleanup costs.

What businesses typically do when cybersecurity issues pop up is rely on their security department for help. This approach is too narrow, however. For a truly security-aware culture, all employees of the business must also be seriously committed to staying abreast of cyber threats. Creating such a culture is facilitated when leaders can influence their team members to adopt certain mindsets and behaviors – precisely the goal of corporate cybersecurity training.

Here are some additional company tips:

  • Improve password management. 123456 remains a surprisingly popular password, a recipe for disaster. Use more complex passwords, change them often, and always limit each one to one account. The best solution is probably the use of password management applications that allow users to create and store strong passwords without needing to remember them.
  • Be mindful that cyber criminals are always looking for new exploits in software. When such exploits are discovered, software developers tend to quickly fix the vulnerability and send out a patch to users before cybercriminals can compromise more users. But these not infrequently have to be downloaded by individual computer users, who often procrastinate and open the door for a breach. One such example was the 2017 WannaCry ransomware attack that targeted Microsoft Windows software. Microsoft distributed a patch months before the attacks occurred but many users postponed downloading, contributing to the infiltration of more than 200,000 computers worldwide.
  • The explosion of remote workers and the hybrid workplace requires companies to be more creative about getting the word out about the importance of security. When employees were predominately based in the office, it was easy to disseminate this message through placards and other means of workplace communication. To ensure a secure hybrid workplace, these reminders now need to be transmitted to employee home computers. And companies would be wise to use gamification to reinforce security awareness training because games are adept at keeping users engaged.
  • Training sessions should be run by teacher/coaches who are empathic and friendly. They also need to be open to taking questions, even if they seem simplistic. Many people, for instance, don’t readily embrace the negative impact of password re-use, arguing that there is no critical information tied to their account. They need to be nicely told this may be true but is nonetheless problematic if the same password is used on other accounts that link personally identifiable information.

Ultimately, companies must embrace more and better cybersecurity training. If it turns out that employees continue to make too many errors, they must explore why. They may find that lack of motivation is the root cause. Employees may see it as an annoyance or something they cannot really control. Either way, companies must work harder still with these folks. Serious employee support is the best way to mitigate breaches.

Featured

  • Gaining a Competitive Edge

    Ask most companies about their future technology plans and the answers will most likely include AI. Then ask how they plan to deploy it, and that is where the responses may start to vary. Every company has unique surveillance requirements that are based on market focus, scale, scope, risk tolerance, geographic area and, of course, budget. Those factors all play a role in deciding how to configure a surveillance system, and how to effectively implement technologies like AI. Read Now

  • 6 Ways Security Awareness Training Empowers Human Risk Management

    Organizations are realizing that their greatest vulnerability often comes from within – their own people. Human error remains a significant factor in cybersecurity breaches, making it imperative for organizations to address human risk effectively. As a result, security awareness training (SAT) has emerged as a cornerstone in this endeavor because it offers a multifaceted approach to managing human risk. Read Now

  • The Stage is Set

    The security industry spans the entire globe, with manufacturers, developers and suppliers on every continent (well, almost—sorry, Antarctica). That means when regulations pop up in one area, they often have a ripple effect that impacts the entire supply chain. Recent data privacy regulations like GDPR in Europe and CPRA in California made waves when they first went into effect, forcing businesses to change the way they approach data collection and storage to continue operating in those markets. Even highly specific regulations like the U.S.’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) can have international reverberations – and this growing volume of legislation has continued to affect global supply chains in a variety of different ways. Read Now

  • Access Control Technology

    As we move swiftly toward the end of 2024, the security industry is looking at the trends in play, what might be on the horizon, and how they will impact business opportunities and projections. Read Now

Featured Cybersecurity

Webinars

New Products

  • Luma x20

    Luma x20

    Snap One has announced its popular Luma x20 family of surveillance products now offers even greater security and privacy for home and business owners across the globe by giving them full control over integrators’ system access to view live and recorded video. According to Snap One Product Manager Derek Webb, the new “customer handoff” feature provides enhanced user control after initial installation, allowing the owners to have total privacy while also making it easy to reinstate integrator access when maintenance or assistance is required. This new feature is now available to all Luma x20 users globally. “The Luma x20 family of surveillance solutions provides excellent image and audio capture, and with the new customer handoff feature, it now offers absolute privacy for camera feeds and recordings,” Webb said. “With notifications and integrator access controlled through the powerful OvrC remote system management platform, it’s easy for integrators to give their clients full control of their footage and then to get temporary access from the client for any troubleshooting needs.” 3

  • Camden CM-221 Series Switches

    Camden CM-221 Series Switches

    Camden Door Controls is pleased to announce that, in response to soaring customer demand, it has expanded its range of ValueWave™ no-touch switches to include a narrow (slimline) version with manual override. This override button is designed to provide additional assurance that the request to exit switch will open a door, even if the no-touch sensor fails to operate. This new slimline switch also features a heavy gauge stainless steel faceplate, a red/green illuminated light ring, and is IP65 rated, making it ideal for indoor or outdoor use as part of an automatic door or access control system. ValueWave™ no-touch switches are designed for easy installation and trouble-free service in high traffic applications. In addition to this narrow version, the CM-221 & CM-222 Series switches are available in a range of other models with single and double gang heavy-gauge stainless steel faceplates and include illuminated light rings. 3

  • ResponderLink

    ResponderLink

    Shooter Detection Systems (SDS), an Alarm.com company and a global leader in gunshot detection solutions, has introduced ResponderLink, a groundbreaking new 911 notification service for gunshot events. ResponderLink completes the circle from detection to 911 notification to first responder awareness, giving law enforcement enhanced situational intelligence they urgently need to save lives. Integrating SDS’s proven gunshot detection system with Noonlight’s SendPolice platform, ResponderLink is the first solution to automatically deliver real-time gunshot detection data to 911 call centers and first responders. When shots are detected, the 911 dispatching center, also known as the Public Safety Answering Point or PSAP, is contacted based on the gunfire location, enabling faster initiation of life-saving emergency protocols. 3