Being Unprepared is Not an Option

Being Unprepared is Not an Option

What does the future hold for audit and compliance?

  • By Simon Hill
  • Mar 18, 2019

The cyber landscape has become so sophisticated that data breaches are now nothing new. Hackers are able to get their hands on countless sources of critical data and use it to their advantage, affecting millions and millions of consumers and citizens across the United States and beyond.

However, there are also many data breaches that aren’t in the public eye; there is a data goldmine that sits within the United States Federal Government which isn’t as widely documented, but just like anything, must be kept secure. The consequences of this data being stolen are extremely severe, with risks posed to state, national and global security if it falls into the wrong hands.

To combat this, the federal government must adhere to numerous policies and regulations to ensure the security of the data held. But, not all of these regulations and policies are applied to organizations sitting outside of the federal government, for example, contractors, which handle sensitive federal data when providing their services. This information must be protected to the same standards applied to federal organizations, and one regulation that is gaining attention is DFARS, the Defence Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement which has the purpose of addressing this.

DFARS compliance has a primary objective of protecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and it is mandatory for any outside organization that conducts business with the Department of Defence (DoD) and as a result, processes, stores or transmits CUI. In particular, DFARS Clause 252.204-7012 compels DoD contractors to implement processes and controls to ensure that CDI is kept secure and that reporting mechanisms are in place to ensure cybersecurity incidents are reported.

The scope of DFARS increased in December 2017 to introduce mandatory cybersecurity requirements for contractors and subcontractors to the DoD. Despite this, awareness of the regulation is still low and many contractors are unprepared for an impending audit, oblivious of the challenges it can bring.

The Fine Print

The majority of the requirements of DFARS Clause 252.204-7012 arise from the obligation to meet all of the requirements set out in the NIST SP 800-171 publication. This governs how CUI should be handled and safeguarded in non-federal information systems and organizations.

A primary NIST SP 800-171 requirement is to “implement cryptographic mechanisms to prevent unauthorized disclosure of CUI during transmission unless otherwise protected by alternative safeguards”. Unfortunately, this amounts to challenges and frustrations for many IT departments or individuals, as deploying encryption solutions is thought to be complex, costly and time-consuming. This is not welcome news to departments that are often restricted on budgets and resource. When standard solutions are deployed in an attempt to overcome this, the networks team can become blinded from knowing the type of traffic being encrypted, increasing the difficulty of their day-to-day operations and tasks.

Compliance is Not a Choice

Adhering to regulations such as DFARS is not an option for contractors; it isn’t something that can be implemented when or if time and resource is spare. However, complicated solutions aren’t the only way forward, and they shouldn’t be accepted as the ‘norm’. Network-agnostic solutions focus on protecting the data itself, providing an alternative to the solutions that focus on protecting the network infrastructure and eliminating the cost and complexity usually associated with the deployment of encryption. It is these factors that usually turn encryption into something organizations want to ignore. Additionally, focusing on data rather than the network allows for network visibility, enabling IT teams can continue to do their jobs effectively and that data in transit is protected, meeting the fundamental DFARS requirement.

Who Should be Granted Access?

This is a fundamental question asked by many organizations and is a key challenge of DoD contractor environments. Which personnel should be granted access to which information? In order to adhere to the NIST SP 800-171 requirement, contractors must “establish and manage cryptographic keys for cryptography employed in organizational systems”.

The question is answered with secure, role-based management systems, that allow only authorized access to security policies and the associated encryption keys. With this, contractors can be assured that the CUI within the system is secure and protected; at the same time ensuring that the requirements of DFARS are being adhered to. And the solution is future proof; even if the keys are stolen once, they won’t be able to be used again, as the encryption keys are rotated per policy at the interval prescribed by the authorized user.

Time is Running Out

We know that meeting DFARS cybersecurity requirements can bring several challenges for DoD contractors, but now is the time to adopt the right policies and strategies. The DoD now has various means of enforcement, with cybersecurity clauses being included in both vendor prime and subcontracts for DoD projects. There really is no escape: vendors who do not comply risk not only losing business opportunities with the DoD, but worse, could then be liable for breach of contract actions. It’s not an option, it’s not a choice, and it doesn’t have to be complicated. It’s time to stop shying away from regulations and face them head-on.

Featured

  • TSA Introduces New $45 Fee Option for Travelers Without REAL ID Starting February 1

    The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) announced today that it will refer all passengers who do not present an acceptable form of ID and still want to fly an option to pay a $45 fee to use a modernized alternative identity verification system, TSA Confirm.ID, to establish identity at security checkpoints beginning on February 1, 2026. Read Now

  • The Evolution of IP Camera Intelligence

    As the 30th anniversary of the IP camera approaches in 2026, it is worth reflecting on how far we have come. The first network camera, launched in 1996, delivered one frame every 17 seconds—not impressive by today’s standards, but groundbreaking at the time. It did something that no analog system could: transmit video over a standard IP network. Read Now

  • From Surveillance to Intelligence

    Years ago, it would have been significantly more expensive to run an analytic like that — requiring a custom-built solution with burdensome infrastructure demands — but modern edge devices have made it accessible to everyone. It also saves time, which is a critical factor if a missing child is involved. Video compression technology has played a critical role as well. Over the years, significant advancements have been made in video coding standards — including H.263, MPEG formats, and H.264—alongside compression optimization technologies developed by IP video manufacturers to improve efficiency without sacrificing quality. The open-source AV1 codec developed by the Alliance for Open Media—a consortium including Google, Netflix, Microsoft, Amazon and others — is already the preferred decoder for cloud-based applications, and is quickly becoming the standard for video compression of all types. Read Now

  • Cost: Reactive vs. Proactive Security

    Security breaches often happen despite the availability of tools to prevent them. To combat this problem, the industry is shifting from reactive correction to proactive protection. This article will examine why so many security leaders have realized they must “lead before the breach” – not after. Read Now

  • Achieving Clear Audio

    In today’s ever-changing world of security and risk management, effective communication via an intercom and door entry communication system is a critical communication tool to keep a facility’s staff, visitors and vendors safe. Read Now

Most   Popular

New Products

  • ResponderLink

    ResponderLink

    Shooter Detection Systems (SDS), an Alarm.com company and a global leader in gunshot detection solutions, has introduced ResponderLink, a groundbreaking new 911 notification service for gunshot events. ResponderLink completes the circle from detection to 911 notification to first responder awareness, giving law enforcement enhanced situational intelligence they urgently need to save lives. Integrating SDS’s proven gunshot detection system with Noonlight’s SendPolice platform, ResponderLink is the first solution to automatically deliver real-time gunshot detection data to 911 call centers and first responders. When shots are detected, the 911 dispatching center, also known as the Public Safety Answering Point or PSAP, is contacted based on the gunfire location, enabling faster initiation of life-saving emergency protocols.

  • EasyGate SPT and SPD

    EasyGate SPT SPD

    Security solutions do not have to be ordinary, let alone unattractive. Having renewed their best-selling speed gates, Cominfo has once again demonstrated their Art of Security philosophy in practice — and confirmed their position as an industry-leading manufacturers of premium speed gates and turnstiles.

  • QCS7230 System-on-Chip (SoC)

    QCS7230 System-on-Chip (SoC)

    The latest Qualcomm® Vision Intelligence Platform offers next-generation smart camera IoT solutions to improve safety and security across enterprises, cities and spaces. The Vision Intelligence Platform was expanded in March 2022 with the introduction of the QCS7230 System-on-Chip (SoC), which delivers superior artificial intelligence (AI) inferencing at the edge.