new hampshire polling place

MIT Study Finds That Mobile Voting App Could Pose Cybersecurity Issues For Voters

Tech company Voatz is fighting back against research critical of its security protections, stating that researchers used an outdated version of the app and never examined Voatz servers.

As election officials increasingly consider the possibilities of online voting, particularly through smartphone apps, a new study by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found that one app is so insecure that no state should use it in the upcoming 2020 elections.

The app, created by tech startup Voatz, is already set to be used by thousands of voters as part of a small experiment in mobile voting, according to The New York Times. But MIT researchers reverse-engineered the app to find that security flaws would allow cyber attackers to view votes being cast and potentially change ballots or block them without the user finding out.

Most concerning of all is that the hackers would be able to mess up the paper trail of how the votes were cast originally, making it difficult for elections officials to conduct a “reliable audit,” the Times wrote.

“The choice here is not about turnout but about an adversary controlling the election result and a loss of voter privacy,” the report reads, according to the Times.

Before the report was released to the media, the MIT researchers took their concerns to the Department of Homeland Security, who coordinated a series of briefings with elections officials who were planning to try out the app this year.

DHS told the Times that no one is known to have taken advantage of the flaws found by the researchers, but that the department is continuing to “work with our partners to deepen understanding of the risk.”

The debate has become especially contentious because of Voatz’s response to the claims in the MIT report. Since the report was publicized on Thursday, the company has vehemently defended its app and said that the researchers acted in “bad faith” with their research and recommendations.

“It is clear that from the theoretical nature of the researchers’ approach, the lack of practical evidence backing their claims, their deliberate attempt to remain anonymous prior to publication, and their priority being to find media attention, that the researchers’ true aim is to deliberately disrupt the election process, to sow doubt in the security of our election infrastructure, and to spread fear and confusion,” Voatz said in a statement published on Feb. 13.

The company criticized the MIT researchers for analyzing an outdated Android version of the mobile voting app, not connecting to the Voatz servers and therefore not being subject to security protections and “fabricating an imagined version” of the servers.

“In short, to make claims about a backend server without any evidence or connection to the server negates any degree of credibility on behalf of the researchers,” the Voatz statement reads.

Elections officials are still deciding on how to move forward, caught between recommendations from cybersecurity researchers and the company pointing to previous tests that have produced no visible security issues.

The app “is not perfect — nothing is — and security is always a concern for us,” Donald Kersey, a senior election official in West Virginia, told the Times. “But this is about using new technologies that give us a way to make sure people who maybe can’t always vote have that opportunity.”

Digital Edition

  • Security Today Magazine - March 2020

    March 2020

    Featuring:

    • Transforming the Industry
    • The Open Platform
    • Creating a Standardized Platform
    • Common Mistakes
    •The Next Victims

    View This Issue

  • Environmental Protection
  • Occupational Health & Safety
  • Infrastructure Solutions Group
  • Spaces4Learning
  • Campus Security & Life Safety