COVID-19 Phishing Attacks are Exposing Email Security’s Biggest Flaws

To those of us who work in cybersecurity, hackers and nation state adversaries exploiting the pandemic to drive fear and misunderstanding is certainly horrific, but not at all unexpected. To put the situation into perspective, Tech Republic reported on a 667% increase in malicious email attacks in just a 22-day span (March 1-23). According to the article, more than 2% of those 467,000 spear-phishing emails detected were COVID-19 related.

Adding further context to this percent increase, the nonprofit Anti Phishing Working Group recorded only 132,553 unique email phishing campaigns in all of Q4 2019 - and that was an increase from the previous two quarters!

It is widely accepted that email phishing serves as the primary attack vector for nearly 90% of all cyberattacks. There are a couple of reasons why, led by the ubiquity of email usage. In fact, in 2018, it was estimated that 24.5 billion business emails and 111.1 consumer emails are sent and received each day. The other primary reason that hackers prioritize email is because it was not built with security in mind - it was simply designed as a communications medium that turned out to be riddled with vulnerabilities.

Ever since email evolved into the predominant communications medium in the mid 2000’s, cybersecurity experts and hacking groups have played an endless game of cat and mouse in which every time an adversary improves or alters their phishing techniques, cyber pros counter with a new type of defense. It’s an endless cycle that has benefited both groups.

Amidst COVID-19, trust in email security slows

The increase in phishing attacks in the era of COVID-19 is unimaginable. As if the news cycle wasn’t already bad enough, seemingly every day stories about attacks targeting remote workers and spoofing attempts impersonating government and nonprofit organizations such as the CDC and WHO, are penetrating mainstream newsfeeds. There are even coronavirus themed phishing emails pretending to be from President Trump.

Such an onslaught of phishing emails over a short period of time has led many to start asking a simple question - Does email security actually work? A recent article headline in Threatpost, Top Email Protections Fail in Latest COVID-19 Phishing Campaign, suggests that the public may be starting to lose faith in our ability to control phishing.

The truth, however, is that current email phishing attacks remain successful for the same reasons they were effective before COVID-19 made it into our lexicon. Thus, the idea that COVID-19 has triggered email security to fail is a perception created by the unexpected onslaught of attacks and not because of some new and novel phishing techniques that anti-phishing technology doesn’t know how to solve.

The vulnerabilities and challenges of email security tools

Currently, it is the same limitations and vulnerabilities of the two most commonly deployed email security methods – secure email gateways (SEGs) and the Domain-based Authentication Reporting and Conformance (DMARC) protocol – that are enabling so many COVID-19 era malicious emails to make it into both business and consumer inboxes.

Over the past few years, SEGs have been increasingly under the microscope, as attackers continue to get smarter and more proficient at defeating gateway-level controls not built to identify file-less and link-less social engineering attacks. In fact, the continued prevalence of SEGs in both consumer email applications and as B2B email security technology is the main catalyst for the rise in business email compromise attacks, which according to the FBI is now the most costly attack vector for business.

But there are two other limitations of SEGs that prevent this technology from acting as the silver bullet it once was positioned to be. Those include its inability to:

  • Stop 99.5% of email spoofing attacks, including those that link to malicious phishing websites with visually similar login pages.
  • Identify polymorphism, which occurs when an attacker implements a slight but significant and often random changes to an email, such as its content, copy, subject line, sender name or template, in conjunction with or after an initial attack has deployed.

DMARC has also emerged as a popular email security solution to combat the rise of email spoofing attacks. The quagmire with DMARC is that while it is effective at what it was built for - stopping exact domain spoofing attacks - it is time consuming to implement and maintain, while also requires reciprocity to work (meaning the sender and receiver must both be compliant).

It is also important to note that exact domain spoofs, which occurs when an email is sent from a fraudulent domain that matches exactly to the spoofed brand’s domain, represents less than 1% of all email spoofing attempts due to the time and complexity needed to pull it off. With COVID-19, the vast majority of the spoofing emails are either exact sender name impersonations, similar sender name impersonations and look alike/cousin domain name spoofs, which DMARC cannot stop.

Reducing phishing risk in uncertain times

It’s safe to say that there will be many lessons learned post COVID-19. For one, hackers are going to hack and exploit world crises at any time to fulfill their motivation. As a result, the cybersecurity community must unite in the future and make its own pandemic response plan. Until then, consumers must scrutinize every email that looks suspicious and resist the urge to click on links and download attachments unless they are 100% sure of its validity.

Simultaneously, businesses must continue to train their employees in anti-phishing hyper vigilance. As remote work continues, now is the perfect time for security and HR teams to mandate phishing awareness training, or re-training, and to execute test phishing attacks using timely scenarios against employees. For those companies with more advanced email security, such as platforms built on AI and machine learning, risk will still continue to prevail, although it will likely be less than the risk faced by company’s reliant on SEGs and/or DMARC.

I hope people will find some confidence in knowing that email security is not failing. Both SEGs and DMARC are working as they should, although the reality is that both are plagued by the same challenges and limitations that have allowed email phishing attacks to land in mailboxes over time.

Hopefully, the influx of phishing emails will soon fade away along with the coronavirus. Until then, stay safe everyone - both offline and on.

Featured

  • The Evolution of IP Camera Intelligence

    As the 30th anniversary of the IP camera approaches in 2026, it is worth reflecting on how far we have come. The first network camera, launched in 1996, delivered one frame every 17 seconds—not impressive by today’s standards, but groundbreaking at the time. It did something that no analog system could: transmit video over a standard IP network. Read Now

  • From Surveillance to Intelligence

    Years ago, it would have been significantly more expensive to run an analytic like that — requiring a custom-built solution with burdensome infrastructure demands — but modern edge devices have made it accessible to everyone. It also saves time, which is a critical factor if a missing child is involved. Video compression technology has played a critical role as well. Over the years, significant advancements have been made in video coding standards — including H.263, MPEG formats, and H.264—alongside compression optimization technologies developed by IP video manufacturers to improve efficiency without sacrificing quality. The open-source AV1 codec developed by the Alliance for Open Media—a consortium including Google, Netflix, Microsoft, Amazon and others — is already the preferred decoder for cloud-based applications, and is quickly becoming the standard for video compression of all types. Read Now

  • Cost: Reactive vs. Proactive Security

    Security breaches often happen despite the availability of tools to prevent them. To combat this problem, the industry is shifting from reactive correction to proactive protection. This article will examine why so many security leaders have realized they must “lead before the breach” – not after. Read Now

  • Achieving Clear Audio

    In today’s ever-changing world of security and risk management, effective communication via an intercom and door entry communication system is a critical communication tool to keep a facility’s staff, visitors and vendors safe. Read Now

  • Beyond Apps: Access Control for Today’s Residents

    The modern resident lives in an app-saturated world. From banking to grocery delivery, fitness tracking to ridesharing, nearly every service demands another download. But when it comes to accessing the place you live, most people do not want to clutter their phone with yet another app, especially if its only purpose is to open a door. Read Now

New Products

  • Mobile Safe Shield

    Mobile Safe Shield

    SafeWood Designs, Inc., a manufacturer of patented bullet resistant products, is excited to announce the launch of the Mobile Safe Shield. The Mobile Safe Shield is a moveable bullet resistant shield that provides protection in the event of an assailant and supplies cover in the event of an active shooter. With a heavy-duty steel frame, quality castor wheels, and bullet resistant core, the Mobile Safe Shield is a perfect addition to any guard station, security desks, courthouses, police stations, schools, office spaces and more. The Mobile Safe Shield is incredibly customizable. Bullet resistant materials are available in UL 752 Levels 1 through 8 and include glass, white board, tack board, veneer, and plastic laminate. Flexibility in bullet resistant materials allows for the Mobile Safe Shield to blend more with current interior décor for a seamless design aesthetic. Optional custom paint colors are also available for the steel frame.

  • AC Nio

    AC Nio

    Aiphone, a leading international manufacturer of intercom, access control, and emergency communication products, has introduced the AC Nio, its access control management software, an important addition to its new line of access control solutions.

  • PE80 Series

    PE80 Series by SARGENT / ED4000/PED5000 Series by Corbin Russwin

    ASSA ABLOY, a global leader in access solutions, has announced the launch of two next generation exit devices from long-standing leaders in the premium exit device market: the PE80 Series by SARGENT and the PED4000/PED5000 Series by Corbin Russwin. These new exit devices boast industry-first features that are specifically designed to provide enhanced safety, security and convenience, setting new standards for exit solutions. The SARGENT PE80 and Corbin Russwin PED4000/PED5000 Series exit devices are engineered to meet the ever-evolving needs of modern buildings. Featuring the high strength, security and durability that ASSA ABLOY is known for, the new exit devices deliver several innovative, industry-first features in addition to elegant design finishes for every opening.