Where Compliance Falls Short

Taking a proactive approach to risk in the healthcare industry

Changes to our digital spaces in recent years have led to an increase in IT risk—especially in the healthcare space. With more digitization comes an increased number of risks. Nearly 85% of healthcare data breaches reported to the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) in 2022 were attributed to hacking and IT incidents, according to data from the HHS. With more determined threat actors wanting to exploit patient data, a proactive approach to seeing, understanding and acting on risk is vital to improving the effectiveness of security.

Most organizations think that compliance is the first step to protecting it, but this approach leaves healthcare institutions out of touch when it comes to the threat landscape. Information security leaders and chief information security officers (CISOs) at healthcare facilities need to get in front of the constantly evolving cyber threats that loom over not only their business, but their patient and client data too. Understanding where compliance falls short is vital to creating an agile and responsive risk management program that connects back to business strategy.

The Difference Between a Compliance-based and Risk-based Approach
While compliance and risk are two sides of the same coin, they are focused on different issues. Compliance is based on a framework of statutory, regulatory or contractual requirements that are either met or unmet. Risk is focused around managing uncertainty with processes designed to achieve positive business outcomes.

Compliance and risk management programs both help healthcare organizations maintain stability and integrity on multiple levels, which prevent risks to the organization’s legal liability, financial position, reputation and physical assets. Compliance is more prescriptive and results in a more tactical, check-the-box approach. Risk management is predictive, anticipating risks, and requires a strategic approach. While compliance is still the typical starting point in protecting an organization (often due to the fines and regulatory actions associated with noncompliance), focusing exclusively on compliance can leave businesses short-sighted and exposed to unseen risk.

Because the main focus of risk is managing uncertainty, it has specific processes designed to achieve positive business outcomes. This is especially relevant to healthcare. Cyberthreats have become a constant, and with threat actors greater in number and working more creatively to breach organizations, having a proactive approach to risk can make healthcare facilities more adaptable.

Risk is measured on a continuum, and whether a risk is acceptable will vary depending on an organization’s risk appetite. Understanding where compliance falls short, and the need to shift from a compliance-based to risk-based approach is vital—and looking at how uncertainty is managed is a crucial step.

Why Traditional Compliance can be Inefficient
Compliance audits are point-in-time assessments that appraise the controls already implemented by the organization. The downfall of these assessments is that they don’t focus on how well the organization is protected in real time. When manual processes are involved, it takes too long to start an audit or assess a threat landscape. Oftentimes, by the time an assessment is complete, the data is outdated because of an infrastructure change, regulatory update or new vulnerabilities. A compliance-first approach is no longer adequate to reduce risk and ensure that patient data is secure.

According to the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives’ (CHIME) Digital Health Most Wired Survey, 40% of healthcare organizations still don’t have a dedicated CISO, down 12% from 2021. For those organizations without a CISO, they rely too often on managers and other employees to be vigilant regarding phishing attempts, HIPAA breaches and other compliance threats and violations.

Healthcare leaders need to recognize that this kind of compliance isn’t forward-looking and can lead to significant gaps in security. To support this, budgets are growing for a risk-first approach, citing risk management as a business priority almost twice as often as compliance. Security leaders understand that compliance with rules and regulations rarely translates into value-generating business propositions without the addition of a long-range risk management strategy. Compliance often leads to some risk avoidance, but risk management can help healthcare facilities proactively navigate risk, especially in this demanding regulatory environment.

The Value of a Modern Risk-Management Solution
Selecting the right risk management approach is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Within the healthcare industry, businesses may need to focus on different aspects of patient data and security. With a modern risk management program, healthcare organizations can gain high-level insight into their compliance and risk postures and gain visibility into how compliance activities reduce both IT and cyber risk.

Not only will this provide deeper insights into risk and compliance, but it will allow healthcare organizations to break down silos, eliminate gaps and reduce any potential or current blind spots. Healthcare organizations should also seek out solutions that report on risk in the context of specific business objectives—helping the C-suite and board understand its value to strategy.
A risk-management program can also include automating tasks associated with risk calculation, giving managers automatic alerts when risk increases. Not only will this reduce any manual errors associated with calculating risk—after all, according to a study by IBM, human error is the main cause of 95% of cyber security breaches—but it will also increase accuracy with automated, cross-object risk scoring.

When making this change, it is essential to communicate the new value of risk management so that healthcare leaders can better understand it. This will help show them exactly where and how their investment into risk programs is making the most significant impact—while simultaneously freeing additional time to focus on other valuable hospital-wide objectives.

Cybersecurity leaders in healthcare can deliver better outcomes with less effort by transitioning from a compliance-centric approach to a risk-centric one. Putting cyber risk into business context by using a risk-centric approach allows healthcare CISOs and CIOs to connect risk to the business objectives prioritized by the C-suite and board. With visibility into the organization’s overall risk posture, leaders will have an accurate and relevant view into how their actions and investments are impacting business success.

Featured

  • 12 Commercial Crime Sites to Do Your Research

    12 Commercial Crime Sites to Do Your Research

    Understanding crime statistics in your industry and area is crucial for making important decisions about your security budget. With so much information out there, how can you know which statistics to trust? Read Now

  • Boosting Safety and Efficiency

    Boosting Safety and Efficiency

    In alignment with the state of Mississippi’s mission of “Empowering Mississippi citizens to stay connected and engaged with their government,” Salient's CompleteView VMS is being installed throughout more than 150 state boards, commissions and agencies in order to ensure safety for thousands of constituents who access state services daily. Read Now

  • Live From GSX: Post-Show Review

    Live From GSX: Post-Show Review

    This year’s Live From GSX program was a rousing success! Again, we’d like to thank our partners, and IPVideo, for working with us and letting us broadcast their solutions to the industry. You can follow our Live From GSX 2023 page to keep up with post-show developments and announcements. And if you’re interested in working with us in 2024, please don’t hesitate to ask about our Live From programs for ISC West in March or next year’s GSX. Read Now

    • Industry Events
    • GSX
  • People Say the Funniest Things

    People Say the Funniest Things

    By all accounts, GSX version 2023 was completely successful. Apparently, there were plenty of mix-ups with the airlines and getting aircraft from the East Coast into Big D. I am all ears when I am in a gathering of people. You never know when a nugget of information might flip out. Read Now

    • Industry Events
    • GSX

Featured Cybersecurity

Webinars

New Products

  • XS4 Original+

    XS4 Original+

    The SALTO XS4 Original+ design is based on the same proven housing and mechanical mechanisms of the XS4 Original. The XS4 Original+, however, is embedded with SALTO’s BLUEnet real-time functionality and SVN-Flex capability that enables SALTO stand-alone smart XS4 Original+ locks to update user credentials directly at the door. Compatible with the array of SALTO platform solutions including SALTO Space data-on-card, SALTO KS Keys as a Service cloud-based access solution, and SALTO’s JustIn Mobile technology for digital keys. The XS4 Original+ also includes RFID Mifare DESFire, Bluetooth LE and NFC technology functionality. 3

  • Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden Door Controls has relaunched its CV-7600 card readers in response to growing market demand for a more secure alternative to standard proximity credentials that can be easily cloned. CV-7600 readers support MIFARE DESFire EV1 & EV2 encryption technology credentials, making them virtually clone-proof and highly secure. 3

  • HD2055 Modular Barricade

    Delta Scientific’s electric HD2055 modular shallow foundation barricade is tested to ASTM M50/P1 with negative penetration from the vehicle upon impact. With a shallow foundation of only 24 inches, the HD2055 can be installed without worrying about buried power lines and other below grade obstructions. The modular make-up of the barrier also allows you to cover wider roadways by adding additional modules to the system. The HD2055 boasts an Emergency Fast Operation of 1.5 seconds giving the guard ample time to deploy under a high threat situation. 3