Supporting PIV I Cards

How to determine if your physical access control system supports the solution

When your physical access control system (PACS) manufacturer tells you its system supports PIV-I “end-to-end,” you might want to do some additional digging to make sure you both agree as to what that really means. Legacy PACS designed for proximity cards (or even PIV cards) are unlikely to support PIV-I cards without specific upgrades for handling 128-bit identifiers. Just because a PACS supports PIV cards doesn’t mean it supports PIV-I cards. In a plug-and-play world, it may be your job to ensure that each component is capable of PIV-I.

PIV Card Identifiers

The identifier on a PIV card is the 32-digit Federal Agency Smart Credential Number (or FASC-N). The FASC-N, found in the card’s CHUID container, is a “smart number” consisting of nine fields.

The first five FASC-N fields—16 binary coded digits—are sufficient to uniquely identify every federally issued credential. That means that physical access control systems may safely use the first 16 digits of the FASC-N as the card identifier without concern for duplicates. The largest possible 16-digit identifier would therefore be 9,999,999,999,999,999, which happens to require 54 bits. Most access control panels cannot store a value as large as this as a single number. Instead, they employ schemes that split the value into two or three logical parts. A common method is to concatenate the agency code, system code and credential number (14 digits), forming one number, and the credential series code and individual credential issue (2 digits), forming another number. Another method is to combine the agency code and system code into a number represented as the traditional “facility code” and store the credential number as the traditional “card number.”

This is often done to avoid updating panel firmware and head-end software to support larger identifiers.

PIV-I Card Identifiers

PIV-I cards are intended for non-federal issuers. The number of organizations that could potentially deploy it is so large that the agency code-system code-credential number method used by PIV cards would not work. Therefore, with PIV-I, the FASC-N can no longer be used as the card identifier. In fact, the first 14 digits of the FASC-N on a PIV-I card are all 9s.

Therefore, if a system can read only a partial FASC-N, all PIV-I cards would appear the same.

PIV-I credentials must use a different numbering system called the globally unique identifier (GUID), which also is found in the CHUID container. The construction of the GUID has some important properties that impact physical access control systems. A GUID is generated in a way that ensures uniqueness across the planet, even if the machine generating it is “off the grid.” The GUID is always 128 bits, which is more than double the size of the 16-digit truncated FASC-N.

The Reader

The reader must be able to recognize that the credential is a PIV-I card. The correct way for the reader to do this is to read the CHUID and check the first 14 digits of the FASC-N. If it is not all 9s, it then outputs the FASC-N. If it is all 9s, it outputs the GUID. The panel must be able to accept cards of both formats—FASC-N or GUID.

The Panel

PIV-I credentials require the control panel and the head end to store larger values for identifiers. These values can still be broken into smaller pieces for ease of storage, but because the GUID is a series of 128 bits rather than a string of binary coded digits, the panel must employ a different method for splitting a GUID received from a reader.

Splitting must be done by bits, not digits. When a PIV-I GUID arrives on the reader port, the panel must split the GUID and compare it with pieces of GUIDs previously received from the head end.

The Head End

Because head-end computers usually have larger memory capacities and more sophisticated database engines, the PIV-I GUID can often be stored as a single 128-bit value. In fact, Microsoft SQL Server supports the GUID as a data type. Regardless, head-end software must be able to accept a GUID as card identifier from the enroller and must be able to send the complete GUID to the panel. The panel must be capable of storing the GUID in a way that it can quickly be compared with the GUID arriving on a reader port.

Remember, there are many things to keep in mind when determining if your PACS supports PIV-I “end-to-end” and whether your access control system truly has the capability to support PIV-I cards.

This article originally appeared in the June 2012 issue of Security Today.

Featured

  • Empowering and Securing a Mobile Workforce

    What happens when technology lets you work anywhere – but exposes you to security threats everywhere? This is the reality of modern work. No longer tethered to desks, work happens everywhere – in the office, from home, on the road, and in countless locations in between. Read Now

  • TSA Introduces New $45 Fee Option for Travelers Without REAL ID Starting February 1

    The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) announced today that it will refer all passengers who do not present an acceptable form of ID and still want to fly an option to pay a $45 fee to use a modernized alternative identity verification system, TSA Confirm.ID, to establish identity at security checkpoints beginning on February 1, 2026. Read Now

  • The Evolution of IP Camera Intelligence

    As the 30th anniversary of the IP camera approaches in 2026, it is worth reflecting on how far we have come. The first network camera, launched in 1996, delivered one frame every 17 seconds—not impressive by today’s standards, but groundbreaking at the time. It did something that no analog system could: transmit video over a standard IP network. Read Now

  • From Surveillance to Intelligence

    Years ago, it would have been significantly more expensive to run an analytic like that — requiring a custom-built solution with burdensome infrastructure demands — but modern edge devices have made it accessible to everyone. It also saves time, which is a critical factor if a missing child is involved. Video compression technology has played a critical role as well. Over the years, significant advancements have been made in video coding standards — including H.263, MPEG formats, and H.264—alongside compression optimization technologies developed by IP video manufacturers to improve efficiency without sacrificing quality. The open-source AV1 codec developed by the Alliance for Open Media—a consortium including Google, Netflix, Microsoft, Amazon and others — is already the preferred decoder for cloud-based applications, and is quickly becoming the standard for video compression of all types. Read Now

  • Cost: Reactive vs. Proactive Security

    Security breaches often happen despite the availability of tools to prevent them. To combat this problem, the industry is shifting from reactive correction to proactive protection. This article will examine why so many security leaders have realized they must “lead before the breach” – not after. Read Now

New Products

  • Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden Door Controls has relaunched its CV-7600 card readers in response to growing market demand for a more secure alternative to standard proximity credentials that can be easily cloned. CV-7600 readers support MIFARE DESFire EV1 & EV2 encryption technology credentials, making them virtually clone-proof and highly secure.

  • AC Nio

    AC Nio

    Aiphone, a leading international manufacturer of intercom, access control, and emergency communication products, has introduced the AC Nio, its access control management software, an important addition to its new line of access control solutions.

  • Connect ONE’s powerful cloud-hosted management platform provides the means to tailor lockdowns and emergency mass notifications throughout a facility – while simultaneously alerting occupants to hazards or next steps, like evacuation.

    Connect ONE®

    Connect ONE’s powerful cloud-hosted management platform provides the means to tailor lockdowns and emergency mass notifications throughout a facility – while simultaneously alerting occupants to hazards or next steps, like evacuation.