What Everyone Should Know about Privacy, Security and Confidentiality

What Everyone Should Know about Privacy, Security and Confidentiality

When conducting a review of how a service provider will handle personal information for this or that process, the subject inevitably turns to the protection of the personal information involved. Often it is said that everything should be fine; the vendor passed the security review and the confidentiality clause is airtight. While these things are good and important and are positive statements about information protection, management, and recourse in the event it is needed; they are not answers as to how the personal information will be protected; i.e.; how privacy will be managed. 

The reason for this is the goals and requirement of privacy are not entirely the same as those of information security or those of confidentiality. As such, it is important not to confuse one for the other. In fact, doing so may create risk rather than mitigate it.

So, how is data privacy different from information security and from confidentiality? How are they alike? How they are alike is easy to answer. They are all forms of information protection. Beyond that it is easier to understand how they overlap by understanding how they are different.

Let’s start with definitions. 

Privacy is the fair and authorized processing and access of personal information. Note there are many definitions of privacy.  This is an operational definition.

What Everyone Should Know about Privacy Security and Confidentiality

Personal information is any information that can be used to identify or contact an individual or be reasonably linked to a specific individual, device or computer.

Processing is any action or inaction that can be performed in relation to that data or dataset. Processing personal information includes, but is not limited to, collection, storage, use, sharing, organization, display, recording, alignment, combination, disclosure by transmission, copying, consultation, erasure, destruction, and alteration of personally identifiable information and any data related to it.

Fair and authorized includes notions of the ideas embodied in the Fair Information Practice Principles or the OECD Privacy Guidelines such as collection limitation, data quality, purpose specification, use limitation, security safeguards, openness, accountability, and individual participation.

Information Security is that the use of logical, technical, administrative, physical safeguards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the data is maintained.

Confidentiality is preventing authorized access to non-public information that two or more parties have agreed to restrict.

The Overlaps

What Everyone Should Know about Privacy Security and Confidentiality

Information Security safeguards ensure the “authorized” in the “authorized access and use” that is a cornerstone the operational definition of privacy. This is why one cannot have privacy without security. Note, though one can have security without privacy (which is one of the major disconnects) where personal information is not involved.

Three other areas of overlap between privacy and information security:

  • Integrity (Information Security) and Accuracy (Privacy)
    • Information security’s integrity requirement overlaps with privacy’s accuracy requirement in that both target ensuring that the data are not altered without both authentication and authorization
  • Availability (Information Security) and Access (Privacy)
    • Information security’s availability requirement supports privacy’s access requirement because if the data is not available, it cannot be accessed
  • Accountability (both)
    • Both information security and privacy doctrines require data owners and custodians to be responsible for protecting the data in accordance with the respective protection regimen, which is a form of accountability

    What Everyone Should Know about Privacy Security and Confidentiality

    Confidentiality overlaps when the information being identified as “confidential” is both personal information and nonpublic because nonpublic data need to be kept nonpublic.

    Unfortunately, confidentiality does not help much if the data in question is “public.”

    The Disconnects

    First let’s look at the disconnects between Privacy and Information Security. The reason there is not a complete overlap between privacy and information security is threefold.

    First, privacy has a wider set of obligations and responsibilities than information security does, such as:

    • Collection limitation – simply put, there are limits to how data can acceptably be collected; that the collection must be fair and lawful and, where possible, with the individuals consent.
    • Openness – This means there should be transparency about an organization’s processing of personal information.
    • Relevancy – The data collected should be proportional and appropriate for the purpose of the processing.
    • Use limitation – the personal information should not be used for purposes other than those specified when the data was collected without additional permission.

    This means there are things privacy addresses that information security does not.

    The second disconnect is confidentiality. Because personal information (PI) is not always nonpublic (consider the phonebook), the notion of confidentiality does not apply. Also, in a resource-constrained world, if the data are not considered confidential, they are not always “valued” and the necessary measures to ensure authorized access and use will be overlooked.

    Third, and perhaps most important, while information security techniques can be privacy-enabling technologies (PETs) (which means they are tools that enable privacy) and are often necessary, these PETs can also become “feral” if applied incorrectly (i.e. in an invasive manner). As mentioned above, this is why one can have security without privacy, but one cannot have privacy without security.

    As for confidentiality, as mentioned above, confidentiality rules only apply to what is designated by agreement as confidential. This is the first difference between confidentiality and privacy. Confidential is an imposed label that signifies access control. PI is an organic label; it speaks to the substance of the information. Just as with that famous line in Shakespeare’s immortal play Romeo and Juliet “A rose by any other name would smell as sweet,” so it goes with PI. It’s always going to be personal information when it identifies an individual.

    Sometimes confidential information is also personal information. This is when the concepts overlap. Other times, for instance when the information is publically available, the notions of confidentiality miss the mark. Whereas public information – even public personal information -- is free of confidentiality requirements, it is not free of privacy requirements. One example of this is e-marketing lists. Many of our e-mail address are publically available, but that does not mean they can be wantonly maintained on e-marketing lists without our permission.

    So What Does This Mean?

    First and foremost, it is important to understand the difference between information security, confidentiality, and privacy. It is at one’s (or one’s organization’s) peril to substitute one for the other. It means that there is a rich tool set with which to protect information (including personal information), but that it is important for all practitioners of data protection – IP attorneys, Information Security Specialist, and Privacy Professionals – need to be mindful of the data in question and insure the proper protection paradigm is applied.

About the Authors

Michelle Dennedy is the VP and CPO at McAfee.

Jonathan Fox is the director of data privacy at McAfee.

Thomas Finneran is a principal consultant for the IDennedy.

Featured

  • The Key to Wellbeing in the Office

    A few years ago, all we saw in the news was the ‘great resignation.’ Now we have another ‘great’ to deal with. According to CBRE, 2023 was the start of the ‘great return’ as office workers returned to their normal offices after working from home. The data shows that two-thirds of all U.S office buildings were more than 90% leased as of Q2 2023. Read Now

  • Failed Cybersecurity Controls Costing U.S. Businesses $30 Billion Yearly

    Panaseer recently released ControlWatch and the Continuous Controls Battle: Panaseer 2025 Security Leaders Report examining the cost of cybersecurity control failures and the impact of growing personal liability for security failings on security leaders. The report analyzes the findings of a survey of 400 security decision makers (SDMs) across the US and UK. It shows that security leaders feel under increasing pressure to provide assurances around cybersecurity, exposing them to greater personal risk – yet many lack the data and resources to accurately report and close cybersecurity gaps. Read Now

  • The Business Case for Video Analytics: Understanding the Real ROI

    For security professionals who may be hesitant to invest in video analytics, now's the time to reconsider. In a newly released Omdia report commissioned by BriefCam (now Milestone Systems), the research firm uncovered a compelling story: more than 85% of North American and European organizations that use video analytics achieve a return on investment within just one year. The study, which surveyed 140 end users across multiple industries, demonstrates that security technology is no longer just for security — it's a cross-organizational tool that delivers measurable business value far beyond traditional safety applications. Read Now

  • Survey: 54% of Organizations Cite Technical Debt as Top Hurdle to Identity System Modernization

    Modernizing identity systems is proving difficult for organizations due to two key challenges: decades of accumulated Identity and Access Management (IAM) technical debt and the complexity of managing access across multiple identity providers (IDPs). These findings come from the new Strata Identity-commissioned report, State of Multi-Cloud Identity: Insights and Trends for 2025. The report, based on survey data from the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA), highlights trends and challenges in securing cloud environments. The CSA is the world’s leading organization dedicated to defining standards, certifications, and best practices to help ensure a secure cloud computing environment. Read Now

Featured Cybersecurity

Webinars

New Products

  • Camden CM-221 Series Switches

    Camden CM-221 Series Switches

    Camden Door Controls is pleased to announce that, in response to soaring customer demand, it has expanded its range of ValueWave™ no-touch switches to include a narrow (slimline) version with manual override. This override button is designed to provide additional assurance that the request to exit switch will open a door, even if the no-touch sensor fails to operate. This new slimline switch also features a heavy gauge stainless steel faceplate, a red/green illuminated light ring, and is IP65 rated, making it ideal for indoor or outdoor use as part of an automatic door or access control system. ValueWave™ no-touch switches are designed for easy installation and trouble-free service in high traffic applications. In addition to this narrow version, the CM-221 & CM-222 Series switches are available in a range of other models with single and double gang heavy-gauge stainless steel faceplates and include illuminated light rings. 3

  • Automatic Systems V07

    Automatic Systems V07

    Automatic Systems, an industry-leading manufacturer of pedestrian and vehicle secure entrance control access systems, is pleased to announce the release of its groundbreaking V07 software. The V07 software update is designed specifically to address cybersecurity concerns and will ensure the integrity and confidentiality of Automatic Systems applications. With the new V07 software, updates will be delivered by means of an encrypted file. 3

  • PE80 Series

    PE80 Series by SARGENT / ED4000/PED5000 Series by Corbin Russwin

    ASSA ABLOY, a global leader in access solutions, has announced the launch of two next generation exit devices from long-standing leaders in the premium exit device market: the PE80 Series by SARGENT and the PED4000/PED5000 Series by Corbin Russwin. These new exit devices boast industry-first features that are specifically designed to provide enhanced safety, security and convenience, setting new standards for exit solutions. The SARGENT PE80 and Corbin Russwin PED4000/PED5000 Series exit devices are engineered to meet the ever-evolving needs of modern buildings. Featuring the high strength, security and durability that ASSA ABLOY is known for, the new exit devices deliver several innovative, industry-first features in addition to elegant design finishes for every opening. 3