Alarm - Monitoring from the end user perspective

Alarm!

Monitoring from the end user perspective

We all look at monitoring from a different perspective. The consultant looks at it from a cost benefit analysis standpoint to represent the client’s best interest. Usually the consultant’s client is the end user that will have the most interaction with the monitoring service. The integrator looks at monitoring from a recurring revenue standpoint and in some cases the generator of service calls.

Let’s look at monitoring from the end user perspective. I find that the end user perspective is usually that first and last thing on integrators’ minds when signing them up for monitoring contracts. The end user is first on the integrator’s mind when getting a one-year or more service agreement signed that also includes the monitoring piece from a central station service provider.

However, the end user is last on the mind when thinking about the fact that from the signing of the contract forward most of the interaction with the central station is from the end user. If a false alarm is generated, the end user and the central station speak. If a real alarm is generated, the central station and the end user speak. If there is a change to the call list or telephone numbers or anything else regarding contact information, the end user and the central station speak. In fact, it is a forgotten topic in most integrators that during the recurring revenue period after installation the real relationship is between the end user and the central station.

I was a service manager for a large integrator back in my integrator days, and I was the solution to a lot of upset clients after they had a problem. The people that they trusted so much, the central station operators, now could not help them because they had a door replaced and didn’t realize they needed to move the door contact and magnet over to the new door.

Simple problem: if they were speaking to the integrator it would be easily solved with a quick service call. In fact, since the monitoring service, central station, answered the phone as our company name the end user had no idea that they were a thirdparty center and had no ability to assist with our service call. Arguments ensue and the end user gets angry and fires the integrator not ever knowing that the next integrator uses the same central station third-party service, so really nothing changed but the integrator.

End users build a trust and respect element based on interactions with the person on the other end of the phone during a false alarm, a real alarm, or a change in information. This trust gets built typically with the central station operators and as an integrator that uses third party central station services your main concern will be to not lose a seat at the table with that end user.

As an integrator a good way to “keep a seat at the end user’s table” is to provide life cycle management services that provide periodic contact with the end user. Good types of contacts would be to send customer satisfaction surveys, send system health monitoring reports, provide a cost free service call to check the battery or other elements prior to warranty expiration or service agreement period ending. These little contacts that are non-abrasive and customer service oriented end up providing the optimal customer service without being that person they end up regretting the calls from.

This article originally appeared in the April 2015 issue of Security Today.

About the Author

Charlie Howell is an independent security consultant in Northern California.

Featured

New Products

  • QCS7230 System-on-Chip (SoC)

    QCS7230 System-on-Chip (SoC)

    The latest Qualcomm® Vision Intelligence Platform offers next-generation smart camera IoT solutions to improve safety and security across enterprises, cities and spaces. The Vision Intelligence Platform was expanded in March 2022 with the introduction of the QCS7230 System-on-Chip (SoC), which delivers superior artificial intelligence (AI) inferencing at the edge.

  • Mobile Safe Shield

    Mobile Safe Shield

    SafeWood Designs, Inc., a manufacturer of patented bullet resistant products, is excited to announce the launch of the Mobile Safe Shield. The Mobile Safe Shield is a moveable bullet resistant shield that provides protection in the event of an assailant and supplies cover in the event of an active shooter. With a heavy-duty steel frame, quality castor wheels, and bullet resistant core, the Mobile Safe Shield is a perfect addition to any guard station, security desks, courthouses, police stations, schools, office spaces and more. The Mobile Safe Shield is incredibly customizable. Bullet resistant materials are available in UL 752 Levels 1 through 8 and include glass, white board, tack board, veneer, and plastic laminate. Flexibility in bullet resistant materials allows for the Mobile Safe Shield to blend more with current interior décor for a seamless design aesthetic. Optional custom paint colors are also available for the steel frame.

  • HD2055 Modular Barricade

    Delta Scientific’s electric HD2055 modular shallow foundation barricade is tested to ASTM M50/P1 with negative penetration from the vehicle upon impact. With a shallow foundation of only 24 inches, the HD2055 can be installed without worrying about buried power lines and other below grade obstructions. The modular make-up of the barrier also allows you to cover wider roadways by adding additional modules to the system. The HD2055 boasts an Emergency Fast Operation of 1.5 seconds giving the guard ample time to deploy under a high threat situation.