Patent Trolls Up to No Good

There are troubling, albeit legal, shenanigans going on not only in the security industry but in several other industries, as well. It is all about patents for products that are on the market, and may have been for quite some time.

Several security equipment manufacturers contacted me about “patent trolls.” I’ve read about them, including those in the security industry, only to find out that what they are doing is perfectly legal, but I wonder if it is ethical.

The situation has affected all entities in the security industry from manufacturer, end user and integrator. All have felt the blunt touch of the legal system, thanks to the patent trolls, so much so that the Security Industry Association (SIA) is urging house and senate leaders to take up companion bills that would crack down on abuses by patent assertion entities.

The main offender, or the company that seems to be on the other ends of the lawsuits, is none other than Hawk Technology systems, LLC. If you’re in the security industry, you’ve likely heard of them, and about them. They have been active in filing patent lawsuits nationwide.

In a letter to House Speaker John Boehner and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, SIA is asking the House to pass the Innovation Act (H.R. 9), bipartisan legislation in increase accountability on patent litigation and to stop patent trolls. Letters have been sent to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Minority Leader Harry Reid, requesting action on the Protecting American Talent and Entrepreneurship Act (S. 1137), which would increase accountability while thwarting patent trolls.

According to SIA, patent trolls are companies or individuals that threaten businesses with lawsuits based on vague or overly broad patents in an effort to collect money from settlements. Security product manufacturers spend millions of dollars each year defending against frivolous patent litigation.

I had a nice, but short conversation last month with Marc Shulman, who said he was the legal consultant and a partner with Barry H. Schwab, who claims to be the inventor of numerous patents, including the ‘462 patent; now reissued as Patent #RE43462, which is “A PC-based system for monitoring and storing representative images from video cameras that may be utilized for security or other monitoring applications. Camera inputs from digital or analog sources are individually and independently digitized and displayed,and may be stored in digital form on various recording media. Provisions are included for adding detection or alarm systems which will automatically alter image size, sampling rate and/or frame rate of an individual input source, or activate other physical responses. In addition to security system monitoring, further applications of the invention are disclosed for process monitoring in manufacturing environments and also for applications in videoconferencing.”

This kind of activity is not new; in fact, the music industry has been battling this for years, maybe decades.

Well-known and respected attorney Ken Kirschenbaum, said patent lawsuits and costly to prosecute and costly to defend. For the most part, it’s all about the money.

“The security industry invests considerable time, research and development and human capital into developing a wide range of cutting-edge security solutions through their trusted channel partners into various markets,” said Jake Parker, SIA director of government relations. “The aggressive efforts of patent trolls are a significant threat to investment in the next generation of security products.”

Security companies have not sat idly by to see what happens. On-Net Surveillance System Inc. has filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of New York vs., Hawk Technology. OnSSI is seeking a declaratory judgment of non-infringement of the patent in question, and they claim they and their customers have a license to and/or are covered by a covenant not to be sued for infringement of the ‘462 patent.

This is not new business for Hawk Technology. The name itself is somewhat deceiving because they do not manufacture any products or offer for sale any products or services. Formed in 2012, their business is directed to owning and enforcing the ‘462 Patent in litigation. They have been busy. To date, Hawk Technology has filed more than 115 lawsuits for infringement of the patent, and such suits have been filed in judicial districts nationwide.

According to the lawsuit filed of OnSSI, they state, “On information and belief, Hawk has followed each filing with a demand for a quick settlement at a price far lower than the cost to defend the litigation.”

Seems like this is an “anything for a quick buck,” style of litigation. Others have been successful in defending their company practices. For instance, Genetec filed a declaratory judgment action against Hawk Technology in August 2014

Jones Day represented Genetec, Inc. in an action seeking a declaration that it did not infringe, and had intervening rights in, Hawk Technology Systems, LLC’s U.S. Reissue Patent No. RE 43,462, claiming to cover video storage and display technology. Genetec further sought a declaration that the ‘462 patent was invalid. Jones Day resolved the matter for Genetec, ensuring its integrators, distributors and customers were protected from Hawk’s ongoing infringement litigation efforts.Is it legal for Hawk Technology to do this? Yes. Is it ethical? Not so much.

This article originally appeared in the October 2015 issue of Security Today.

Featured

  • Survey: 54% of Organizations Cite Technical Debt as Top Hurdle to Identity System Modernization

    Modernizing identity systems is proving difficult for organizations due to two key challenges: decades of accumulated Identity and Access Management (IAM) technical debt and the complexity of managing access across multiple identity providers (IDPs). These findings come from the new Strata Identity-commissioned report, State of Multi-Cloud Identity: Insights and Trends for 2025. The report, based on survey data from the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA), highlights trends and challenges in securing cloud environments. The CSA is the world’s leading organization dedicated to defining standards, certifications, and best practices to help ensure a secure cloud computing environment. Read Now

  • Study: Only 35 Percent of Companies Include Cybersecurity Teams When Implementing AI

    Only 35 percent of cybersecurity professionals or teams are involved in the development of policy governing the use of AI technology in their enterprise, and nearly half (45 percent) report no involvement in the development, onboarding, or implementation of AI solutions, according to the recently released 2024 State of Cybersecurity survey report from ISACA, a global professional association advancing trust in technology. Read Now

  • New Report Series Highlights E-Commerce Threats, Fraud Against Retailers

    Trustwave, a cybersecurity and managed security services provider, recently released a series of reports detailing the threats facing the retail sector, marking the second year of its ongoing research into these critical security issues. Read Now

  • Stay Secure in 2024: Updated Cybersecurity Tips for the Office and at Home

    Cyber criminals get more inventive every year. Cybersecurity threats continue to evolve and are a moving target for business owners in 2024. Companies large and small need to employ cybersecurity best practices throughout their organization. That includes security integrators, manufacturers, and end users. Read Now

Featured Cybersecurity

Webinars

New Products

  • 4K Video Decoder

    3xLOGIC’s VH-DECODER-4K is perfect for use in organizations of all sizes in diverse vertical sectors such as retail, leisure and hospitality, education and commercial premises. 3

  • AC Nio

    AC Nio

    Aiphone, a leading international manufacturer of intercom, access control, and emergency communication products, has introduced the AC Nio, its access control management software, an important addition to its new line of access control solutions. 3

  • Luma x20

    Luma x20

    Snap One has announced its popular Luma x20 family of surveillance products now offers even greater security and privacy for home and business owners across the globe by giving them full control over integrators’ system access to view live and recorded video. According to Snap One Product Manager Derek Webb, the new “customer handoff” feature provides enhanced user control after initial installation, allowing the owners to have total privacy while also making it easy to reinstate integrator access when maintenance or assistance is required. This new feature is now available to all Luma x20 users globally. “The Luma x20 family of surveillance solutions provides excellent image and audio capture, and with the new customer handoff feature, it now offers absolute privacy for camera feeds and recordings,” Webb said. “With notifications and integrator access controlled through the powerful OvrC remote system management platform, it’s easy for integrators to give their clients full control of their footage and then to get temporary access from the client for any troubleshooting needs.” 3