Report Shows the Limits of Police Body Cameras

Report Shows the Limits of Police Body Cameras

Body-worn cameras for police have been seen frequently in the news recently, spurred by the deaths of unarmed civilians. While activists and families call for greater police accountability, police departments want to show proof of their perspective in tense situations. The increase in bystander cellphone footage has contributed to the demand for more video evidence of police encounters, but the existence of police footage calls into question many issues such as privacy, access and storage.

The Brennan Center for Justice has recently published a report on these issues. The center pulled together policies from police departments across the country to compare and contrast their views on things such as how footage is stored, limits on recording civilians, police access to footage and public access to footage.

One of the most inconsistent policies seen from department to department was the inattention to privacy. Several cities have policies that prohibit things like recording in locker rooms, bathrooms or doctor’s offices but have absolutely no concern for privacy in people’s homes. Only four cities prohibit officers from recording in someone’s home without the owner’s permission during a content search. Another 14 cities don’t address the home at all, there for allowing the camera to record without any restrictions. Four explicitly allow police to record in private homes without consent and no city prohibits police to record in private homes altogether.

Perhaps a reason for the inconsistency in policy is due to the amount of domestic disputes that take place in private homes. Police officers will tell you that these kinds of calls are amongst the most controversial and potentially dangerous calls they make. Some argue that there should be a ban on recording during these calls out of privacy for the victims, while others argue that because of the amount of evidence seen from the moment the police officer arrives, that it is most beneficial to record the entire call. Some cities leave it up to the police officer’s discretion whether or not he or she decides to record.

Another issue is access to the footage. This is an important detail as many police departments do not have the funds to forever keep hours upon hours of non-evidentiary footage. The center found that eight of the 25 police departments involved in the study destroy videos that are not evidence in active cases after 180 days. Seven of the departments keep their videos for up to two years. The other 10 do not have a specific time frame when working with stored data.

An interesting debate that seems to spawn from the storage of video is whether or not the police officers are allowed to view their footage when writing up reports about use of force incidents. Some argue that the officer should not be able to view the footage because the camera is supposed to be used as a tool of transparency and accountability. The center found that 15 of the police departments allowed their officers to view the footage before writing their reports or giving statements. Five allow police to view the video only after they have given their statements.

The most revealing thing we may learn from these policies is which cities have public officials willing to adopt and implement policies to keep law enforcement agencies accountable, and in which cities law enforcement interests wield the power.

The Brennan Center said their project is ongoing. They’ll add new policies and charts as new agencies adopt the body-worn cameras.

About the Author

Sydny Shepard is the Executive Editor of Campus Security & Life Safety.

Featured

  • Pragmatism, Productivity, and the Push for Accountability in 2025-2026

    Every year, the security industry debates whether artificial intelligence is a disruption, an enabler, or a distraction. By 2025, that conversation matured, where AI became a working dimension in physical identity and access management (PIAM) programs. Observations from 2025 highlight this turning point in AI’s role in access control and define how security leaders are being distinguished based on how they apply it. Read Now

  • Report: Cyber Attackers Continue to Turn to AI-Based Tools to Avoid Detection

    Comcast Business recently released its 2025 Cybersecurity Threat Report, a comprehensive analysis of 34.6 billion cybersecurity events detected between June 1,2024 and May 31, 2025. Now in its third year, the report offers business leaders a unique perspective into the evolving threat landscape and provides actionable insights to help organizations strengthen their defenses and align cybersecurity with business risk. Read Now

  • Axis Communications Creates AI-powered Video Surveillance Orchestra

    What if cameras could not only see the world, but interpret it—and respond like orchestra musicians reading sheet music: instantly, precisely, and in perfect harmony? That’s what global network technology leader Axis Communications set to find out. Read Now

  • Just as Expected

    GSX produced a wonderful tradeshow earlier this week. Monday was surprisingly strong in the morning, and the afternoon wasn’t bad at all. That’s Monday’s results and asking attendees to travel on Sunday. Just a quick hint, no one wants to give up their weekend to travel and set up an exhibit booth. I’m just saying. Read Now

    • Industry Events
    • GSX
  • NOLA: The Crescent City

    Twenty years later we finds ourselves in New Orleans. Twenty years ago the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina forced exhibitors and attendees to look elsewhere for tradeshow floor space. Read Now

    • Industry Events
    • GSX

New Products

  • Mobile Safe Shield

    Mobile Safe Shield

    SafeWood Designs, Inc., a manufacturer of patented bullet resistant products, is excited to announce the launch of the Mobile Safe Shield. The Mobile Safe Shield is a moveable bullet resistant shield that provides protection in the event of an assailant and supplies cover in the event of an active shooter. With a heavy-duty steel frame, quality castor wheels, and bullet resistant core, the Mobile Safe Shield is a perfect addition to any guard station, security desks, courthouses, police stations, schools, office spaces and more. The Mobile Safe Shield is incredibly customizable. Bullet resistant materials are available in UL 752 Levels 1 through 8 and include glass, white board, tack board, veneer, and plastic laminate. Flexibility in bullet resistant materials allows for the Mobile Safe Shield to blend more with current interior décor for a seamless design aesthetic. Optional custom paint colors are also available for the steel frame.

  • Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden Door Controls has relaunched its CV-7600 card readers in response to growing market demand for a more secure alternative to standard proximity credentials that can be easily cloned. CV-7600 readers support MIFARE DESFire EV1 & EV2 encryption technology credentials, making them virtually clone-proof and highly secure.

  • QCS7230 System-on-Chip (SoC)

    QCS7230 System-on-Chip (SoC)

    The latest Qualcomm® Vision Intelligence Platform offers next-generation smart camera IoT solutions to improve safety and security across enterprises, cities and spaces. The Vision Intelligence Platform was expanded in March 2022 with the introduction of the QCS7230 System-on-Chip (SoC), which delivers superior artificial intelligence (AI) inferencing at the edge.