Report Shows the Limits of Police Body Cameras

Report Shows the Limits of Police Body Cameras

Body-worn cameras for police have been seen frequently in the news recently, spurred by the deaths of unarmed civilians. While activists and families call for greater police accountability, police departments want to show proof of their perspective in tense situations. The increase in bystander cellphone footage has contributed to the demand for more video evidence of police encounters, but the existence of police footage calls into question many issues such as privacy, access and storage.

The Brennan Center for Justice has recently published a report on these issues. The center pulled together policies from police departments across the country to compare and contrast their views on things such as how footage is stored, limits on recording civilians, police access to footage and public access to footage.

One of the most inconsistent policies seen from department to department was the inattention to privacy. Several cities have policies that prohibit things like recording in locker rooms, bathrooms or doctor’s offices but have absolutely no concern for privacy in people’s homes. Only four cities prohibit officers from recording in someone’s home without the owner’s permission during a content search. Another 14 cities don’t address the home at all, there for allowing the camera to record without any restrictions. Four explicitly allow police to record in private homes without consent and no city prohibits police to record in private homes altogether.

Perhaps a reason for the inconsistency in policy is due to the amount of domestic disputes that take place in private homes. Police officers will tell you that these kinds of calls are amongst the most controversial and potentially dangerous calls they make. Some argue that there should be a ban on recording during these calls out of privacy for the victims, while others argue that because of the amount of evidence seen from the moment the police officer arrives, that it is most beneficial to record the entire call. Some cities leave it up to the police officer’s discretion whether or not he or she decides to record.

Another issue is access to the footage. This is an important detail as many police departments do not have the funds to forever keep hours upon hours of non-evidentiary footage. The center found that eight of the 25 police departments involved in the study destroy videos that are not evidence in active cases after 180 days. Seven of the departments keep their videos for up to two years. The other 10 do not have a specific time frame when working with stored data.

An interesting debate that seems to spawn from the storage of video is whether or not the police officers are allowed to view their footage when writing up reports about use of force incidents. Some argue that the officer should not be able to view the footage because the camera is supposed to be used as a tool of transparency and accountability. The center found that 15 of the police departments allowed their officers to view the footage before writing their reports or giving statements. Five allow police to view the video only after they have given their statements.

The most revealing thing we may learn from these policies is which cities have public officials willing to adopt and implement policies to keep law enforcement agencies accountable, and in which cities law enforcement interests wield the power.

The Brennan Center said their project is ongoing. They’ll add new policies and charts as new agencies adopt the body-worn cameras.

About the Author

Sydny Shepard is the Executive Editor of Campus Security & Life Safety.

Featured

  • New Report Reveals Top Security Risks for U.S. Retail Chains

    Interface Systems, a provider of security, actionable insights, and purpose-built networks for multi-location businesses, has released its 2024 State of Remote Video Monitoring in Retail Chains report. The detailed study analyzed over 2 million monitoring requests across 4,156 retail locations in the United States from September 2023 to August 2024. Read Now

  • Gaining a Competitive Edge

    Ask most companies about their future technology plans and the answers will most likely include AI. Then ask how they plan to deploy it, and that is where the responses may start to vary. Every company has unique surveillance requirements that are based on market focus, scale, scope, risk tolerance, geographic area and, of course, budget. Those factors all play a role in deciding how to configure a surveillance system, and how to effectively implement technologies like AI. Read Now

  • 6 Ways Security Awareness Training Empowers Human Risk Management

    Organizations are realizing that their greatest vulnerability often comes from within – their own people. Human error remains a significant factor in cybersecurity breaches, making it imperative for organizations to address human risk effectively. As a result, security awareness training (SAT) has emerged as a cornerstone in this endeavor because it offers a multifaceted approach to managing human risk. Read Now

  • The Stage is Set

    The security industry spans the entire globe, with manufacturers, developers and suppliers on every continent (well, almost—sorry, Antarctica). That means when regulations pop up in one area, they often have a ripple effect that impacts the entire supply chain. Recent data privacy regulations like GDPR in Europe and CPRA in California made waves when they first went into effect, forcing businesses to change the way they approach data collection and storage to continue operating in those markets. Even highly specific regulations like the U.S.’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) can have international reverberations – and this growing volume of legislation has continued to affect global supply chains in a variety of different ways. Read Now

Featured Cybersecurity

Webinars

New Products

  • PE80 Series

    PE80 Series by SARGENT / ED4000/PED5000 Series by Corbin Russwin

    ASSA ABLOY, a global leader in access solutions, has announced the launch of two next generation exit devices from long-standing leaders in the premium exit device market: the PE80 Series by SARGENT and the PED4000/PED5000 Series by Corbin Russwin. These new exit devices boast industry-first features that are specifically designed to provide enhanced safety, security and convenience, setting new standards for exit solutions. The SARGENT PE80 and Corbin Russwin PED4000/PED5000 Series exit devices are engineered to meet the ever-evolving needs of modern buildings. Featuring the high strength, security and durability that ASSA ABLOY is known for, the new exit devices deliver several innovative, industry-first features in addition to elegant design finishes for every opening. 3

  • Compact IP Video Intercom

    Viking’s X-205 Series of intercoms provide HD IP video and two-way voice communication - all wrapped up in an attractive compact chassis. 3

  • QCS7230 System-on-Chip (SoC)

    QCS7230 System-on-Chip (SoC)

    The latest Qualcomm® Vision Intelligence Platform offers next-generation smart camera IoT solutions to improve safety and security across enterprises, cities and spaces. The Vision Intelligence Platform was expanded in March 2022 with the introduction of the QCS7230 System-on-Chip (SoC), which delivers superior artificial intelligence (AI) inferencing at the edge. 3