2017 Encryption Landscape

2017 Encryption Landscape

There is a growing belief that 2017 will be a decisive year in the battle over encryption that has been quietly raging for over 25 years.  This ongoing battle has pitted the federal government, who argues that some form of encryption backdoors are needed for national security purposes, against security professionals and privacy advocates, who argue that these types of backdoors are foolhardy at best and dangerous at worst.  The recent election of Donald Trump, the self-described “law-and-order” president, threatens to upend the shaky détente that currently exists between these two competing camps.  If early indications are true and Trump does in fact take a more strident approach towards issues of security and privacy, organizations and vendors alike will be facing a radically altered landscape in 2017.

For a preview of the type of changes that may be in store, one needs to look no further than to the UK, where a recently-passed bill, named the British Investigatory Powers Bill (aka “Snooper’s Charter”), is already causing widespread changes.  This new law allows the UK government to engage in online surveillance, to perform wholesale bulk collection of every citizen’s metadata, and to have the legal authority to hack into devices remotely.  Furthermore, the law enables the government to impose what is called a “technical capability notice” on a commercial entity, which would oblige them to change or modify their product to remove any form of electronic protection applied by the company to any communications or data.  In other words, the government is demanding that companies have the backdoor capability of removing the encryption that is being used to protect data.

The impact on commercial entities that deal with any sort of consumer or citizen data is becoming clear: they will be required to collect, store, maintain, and disclose this information when presented with a warrant.  While this will present data storage challenges to an organization, the greater fear is the worry about hacking.  For all the talk about safeguarding data, it’s now clear that it is virtually impossible to stop a determined hacker from compromising data.  In the last year alone, major commercial entities, such as Yahoo, Verizon and LinkedIn, have all been hacked.  In other words, it’s not a question of if a company will be hacked; it’s simply a question of when.  While companies will continue to try to find ways to prevent these hacks, 2017 will be the year of an increased focus on mitigating the impact of inevitable breaches.

On the flip side, security vendors, especially those that deal with encryption technology, will be faced with a dilemma.  Encryption is built on a foundation of math. If a backdoor weakness were purposely built in due to some type of mandate, then the mathematical underpinning of encryption will have an inherent vulnerability that will be identified and exploited by sophisticated hackers.  Furthermore, even if vendors were to put in a backdoor, it would have no real effect at stopping criminals due to the widespread availability of other tools and encryption services that go beyond the reach of federal authorities.  Thus, compliance with any sort of federal mandate will likely result in a significant commercial impact to the vendor’s business as clients migrate to other solutions or services.

To avoid the economic impact caused by the insertion of a backdoor, vendors will likely migrate toward an alternate deployment model that relies on “safe harbor” provisions.  Like the safe harbor provisions used within the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), vendors will claim protection from monetary or legal liability based on the allegedly infringing activities of third parties.  For data being sent across the Internet, this can be achieved by implementing a more advanced encryption model that takes advantage of one-time use keys to protect the data being sent to and from different parties.  For statically stored data, this can be done by moving to a model where the keys used to unlock this stored data are uniquely tied to an individual using biometrics or other similar techniques.  In both models, because the keys are self-deleting and/or uniquely linked to the user, neither the vendor nor the organization can unlock this data themselves and thus cannot be subject to a court order.  Importantly, these approaches also provide an immediate security benefit by providing another protective layer against hackers who attempt to steal data.

The debate that started 25 years ago when the U.S. government attempted to regulate encryption in the early days of the Internet seems destined to explode into the limelight in 2017.  The national conversation that results will dramatically shape the encryption landscape for years to come.   

Featured

  • 5 Tips to Improve Your Password Security

    Change Your Password Day is right around the corner. Observed every year on February 1, the day aims to raise awareness about cybersecurity and underscores the importance of keeping passwords strong and up to date. Read Now

  • Enhancing Port Security

    DP World Yarimca, one of the largest container terminals of the Gulf of İzmit and Turkey, is a strong proponent of using industry-leading technology to deliver unrivaled value to its customers and partners. As the port is growing, DP World Yarimca needs to continue to provide uninterrupted operations and a high level of security.To address these challenges, DP World Yarimca has embraced innovative technological products, including FLIR's comprehensive portfolio of security monitoring solutions. Read Now

  • Hot AI Chatbot DeepSeek Comes Loaded With Privacy, Data Security Concerns

    In the artificial intelligence race powered by American companies like OpenAI and Google, a new Chinese rival is upending the market—even with the possible privacy and data security issues. Read Now

  • Survey: CISOs Increasing Budgets for Crisis Simulations in 2025

    Today, Cyber Performance Center, Hack The Box, released new data showcasing the perspectives of Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) towards cyber preparedness in 2025. In the aftermath of 2024’s high-profile cybersecurity incidents, including NHS, CrowdStrike, TfL, 23andMe, and Cencora, CISOs are reassessing their organization’s readiness to manage a potential “chaos” of a full-scale cyber crisis. Read Now

New Products

  • EasyGate SPT and SPD

    EasyGate SPT SPD

    Security solutions do not have to be ordinary, let alone unattractive. Having renewed their best-selling speed gates, Cominfo has once again demonstrated their Art of Security philosophy in practice — and confirmed their position as an industry-leading manufacturers of premium speed gates and turnstiles.

  • QCS7230 System-on-Chip (SoC)

    QCS7230 System-on-Chip (SoC)

    The latest Qualcomm® Vision Intelligence Platform offers next-generation smart camera IoT solutions to improve safety and security across enterprises, cities and spaces. The Vision Intelligence Platform was expanded in March 2022 with the introduction of the QCS7230 System-on-Chip (SoC), which delivers superior artificial intelligence (AI) inferencing at the edge.

  • PE80 Series

    PE80 Series by SARGENT / ED4000/PED5000 Series by Corbin Russwin

    ASSA ABLOY, a global leader in access solutions, has announced the launch of two next generation exit devices from long-standing leaders in the premium exit device market: the PE80 Series by SARGENT and the PED4000/PED5000 Series by Corbin Russwin. These new exit devices boast industry-first features that are specifically designed to provide enhanced safety, security and convenience, setting new standards for exit solutions. The SARGENT PE80 and Corbin Russwin PED4000/PED5000 Series exit devices are engineered to meet the ever-evolving needs of modern buildings. Featuring the high strength, security and durability that ASSA ABLOY is known for, the new exit devices deliver several innovative, industry-first features in addition to elegant design finishes for every opening.