Travelers with malicious intent could abuse global entry system

Travelers With 'Malicious Intent' Could Abuse Global Entry System, Report Finds

A system that allows international travelers to skip lines when entering the U.S. is ‘vulnerable to exploitation,’ according to a new report from the Department of Homeland Security.

The Global Entry system aims to help overworked customs agents and exhausted passengers alike. The program, implemented by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, allows pre-vetted travelers to enter the country through a kiosk system rather than waiting in long lines to speak to an agent.

But while Global Entry has been popular among travelers – six million Americans are signed up to date – the program is also “vulnerable to exploitation” by criminals seeking to enter the U.S., according to a new report by the inspector general’s office within the Department of Homeland Security.

It wasn’t the actual technology that was at fault, the report found. When travelers enrolled in Global Entry arrive in the U.S., they head to a kiosk that scans their passport and immigration documents before printing a receipt. According to procedure, the passengers must then hand their receipt to a customs officer for inspection before they can officially enter the country.

In nine airports inspected by the office, that procedure was not always followed. Customs officers granted entry to as many as 5,751 Global Entry members without “verifying the authenticity” of their kiosk receipts, according to the report.

“Unless CBP officers authenticate kiosk receipts, someone could use a fraudulent receipt to enter the United States,” the report reads.

The officers also failed to properly check the receipts for a security code that changes on a daily basis, and did not take corrective action when they were notified that the code had been posted online or discarded nearby.

One of the reasons why officers were less inclined to verify the receipts: the process is “cumbersome, ineffective and inadequate,” the report found. The specific verification process was largely redacted from the report.

For its part, CBP accepted each of the report’s recommendations, stating that it is working to remedy the vulnerabilities and ensure compliance with agency policy.

Tim Erlin, the vice president of product management and strategy at the security technology company Tripwire, said that one positive aspect of the report is that process is “often easier to fix than software.”

“It’s tempting to automate as much as possible for security, but maintaining human oversight and involvement is critical for identifying problems,” Erlin said.

About the Author

Haley Samsel is an Associate Content Editor for the Infrastructure Solutions Group at 1105 Media.

Featured

  • The Future is Happening Outside the Cloud

    For years, the cloud has captivated the physical security industry. And for good reason. Remote access, elastic scalability and simplified maintenance reshaped how we think about deploying and managing systems. But as the number of cameras grows and resolutions push from HD to 4K and beyond, the cloud’s limits are becoming unavoidable. Bandwidth bottlenecks. Latency lags. Rising storage costs. These are not abstract concerns. Read Now

  • The Impact of Convergence Between IT and Physical Security

    For years, the worlds of physical security and information technology (IT) remained separate. While they shared common goals and interests, they often worked in silos. Read Now

  • Unlocking Trustworthy AI: Building Transparency in Security Governance

    In situations where AI supports important security tasks like leading investigations and detecting threats and anomalies, transparency is essential. When an incident occurs, investigators must trace the logic behind each automated response to confirm its validity or spot errors. Demanding interpretable AI turns opaque “black boxes” into accountable partners that enhance, rather than compromise, organizational defense. Read Now

  • Seeking Innovative Solutions

    Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression and Acceptance. You may recognize these terms as the “5 Phases” of a grieving process, but they could easily describe the phases one goes through before adopting any new or emerging innovation or technology, especially in a highly risk-averse industry like security. However, the desire for convenience in all aspects of modern life is finally beginning to turn the tide from old school hardware as the go-to towards more user-friendly, yet still secure, door solutions. Read Now

  • Where AI Meets Human Judgment

    Artificial intelligence is everywhere these days. It is driving business growth, shaping consumer experiences, and showing up in places most of us never imagined just a few years ago. Read Now

New Products

  • Automatic Systems V07

    Automatic Systems V07

    Automatic Systems, an industry-leading manufacturer of pedestrian and vehicle secure entrance control access systems, is pleased to announce the release of its groundbreaking V07 software. The V07 software update is designed specifically to address cybersecurity concerns and will ensure the integrity and confidentiality of Automatic Systems applications. With the new V07 software, updates will be delivered by means of an encrypted file.

  • Unified VMS

    AxxonSoft introduces version 2.0 of the Axxon One VMS. The new release features integrations with various physical security systems, making Axxon One a unified VMS. Other enhancements include new AI video analytics and intelligent search functions, hardened cybersecurity, usability and performance improvements, and expanded cloud capabilities

  • AC Nio

    AC Nio

    Aiphone, a leading international manufacturer of intercom, access control, and emergency communication products, has introduced the AC Nio, its access control management software, an important addition to its new line of access control solutions.