detroit police car

Opposition to Government Use of Facial Recognition Technology Grows in Detroit

A recent public meeting exposed tensions about how a city-wide video surveillance system is being used to identify crime suspects in Detroit.

Project Greenlight, Detroit’s opt-in video surveillance system for businesses across the city, was launched to much fanfare in 2016. Meant to deter crime through flashing green lights marking the presence of cameras, the public-private initiative has gained support from community leaders, welcoming its 500th business earlier this year.

But the city’s decision to purchase facial recognition software for the camera system in 2017 did not receive a launch event or widespread local media coverage. Up until a few months ago, it was not common knowledge that Detroit police were using the technology and video footage to pursue people accused of crime.

The issue has gained more attention in Detroit and nationally in recent weeks, with The New York Times publishing a feature on police video surveillance and racial bias in the city. The newspaper reported that the facial recognition program matches faces against 50 million driver’s license photographs and mug shots in a statewide database.

May report by the Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology exposed the extent of the real-time facial recognition system, and the police department has since sought a vote from a local oversight board on a policy regarding the issue.

The Georgetown report, titled “America Under Watch,” criticized the city for not being fully transparent with its residents about the program, including the businessowners who signed up for Project Greenlight without knowledge that they were part of a facial recognition operation.

The project’s website also does not explicitly mention the facial recognition system or how police use potential matches to pursue suspects.

“None of the information provided to prospective partners informs them of the fact that face surveillance is part of Project Green Light, and may be used on their camera feeds,” write authors Clare Garvie and Laura Moy.

At a June police commissioners board meeting, residents spoke out against the surveillance program as well as the potential for the city to use facial recognition with a new traffic light program. The board tabled the facial recognition surveillance measure but voted to approve rules for the traffic light cameras, The Detroit Free Press reported.

One local resident, Tawana Petty, told the board that the “very technologists who created [facial recognition] said it’s harmful and biased,” referring to studies that indicate the software makes more errors when it comes to racial minorities and women.

"I have to push you all to at least understand the technology you’re implementing," Petty said, according to the Free Press. "This will be the largest experiment on black people in the United States — 700,000 black people being submitted to an experiment that has already failed all over the world."

San Francisco became the first major American city to ban police use of facial recognition in May despite police and other security officials calling it a useful crime prevention tool.

No such measure has been introduced in Detroit. But even the man tasked with overseeing surveillance technology acknowledged that the software has accuracy issues when it comes to racial minorities. James White, an assistant police chief, said he has been misidentified as other black men by Facebook’s facial recognition algorithm.

“On the question of false positives — that is absolutely factual, and it’s well-documented,” he said, according to the Times. “So that concerns me as an African-American male.”

The Detroit Police Department’s current solution is to limit the use of facial recognition to the investigation of violent crimes, and not arrest anyone solely on the basis of a match, White said.

But some privacy advocates and residents say the potential benefits — catching people who committed crimes without physical evidence — may not be worth the potential harm to innocent people who are misidentified. In their report, Garvie and Moy write that the increased presence of video cameras at schools, religious institutions and community centers under Project Greenlight may violate the privacy rights of citizens and make them less trustful of law enforcement.

“The goal of these surveillance cameras is to make Detroit’s residents feel safe going about their daily lives,” they wrote. “Adding face surveillance to these cameras risks doing the opposite.”

Featured

  • Maximizing Your Security Budget This Year

    7 Ways You Can Secure a High-Traffic Commercial Security Gate  

    Your commercial security gate is one of your most powerful tools to keep thieves off your property. Without a security gate, your commercial perimeter security plan is all for nothing. Read Now

  • Busy South Africa Building Integrates Custom Access Control System

    Nicol Corner, based in Bedfordview, Johannesburg, South Africa, is home to a six-star fitness club, prime office space, and an award-winning rooftop restaurant. This is the first building in South Africa to have its glass façade fully incorporate fritted glazing, saving 35% on energy consumption. Nicol Corner (Pty) LTD has developed a landmark with sophisticated design and unique architecture by collaborating with industry-leading partners and specifying world-class equipment throughout the project. This includes installing a high-spec, bespoke security and access control system. Read Now

  • Only 13 Percent of Research Institutions Are Prepared for AI

    A new survey commissioned by SHI International and Dell Technologies underscores the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) while exposing significant gaps in preparedness at many research institutions. Read Now

  • Survey: 70 Percent of Organizations Have Established Dedicated SaaS Security Teams

    Seventy percent of organizations have prioritized investment in SaaS security, establishing dedicated SaaS security teams, despite economic uncertainty and workforce reductions. This was a key finding in the fourth Annual SaaS Security Survey Report: 2025 CISO Plans and Priorities released today by the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA), the world’s leading organization dedicated to defining standards, certifications, and best practices to help ensure a secure cloud computing environment. Read Now

Featured Cybersecurity

Webinars

New Products

  • Luma x20

    Luma x20

    Snap One has announced its popular Luma x20 family of surveillance products now offers even greater security and privacy for home and business owners across the globe by giving them full control over integrators’ system access to view live and recorded video. According to Snap One Product Manager Derek Webb, the new “customer handoff” feature provides enhanced user control after initial installation, allowing the owners to have total privacy while also making it easy to reinstate integrator access when maintenance or assistance is required. This new feature is now available to all Luma x20 users globally. “The Luma x20 family of surveillance solutions provides excellent image and audio capture, and with the new customer handoff feature, it now offers absolute privacy for camera feeds and recordings,” Webb said. “With notifications and integrator access controlled through the powerful OvrC remote system management platform, it’s easy for integrators to give their clients full control of their footage and then to get temporary access from the client for any troubleshooting needs.” 3

  • Mobile Safe Shield

    Mobile Safe Shield

    SafeWood Designs, Inc., a manufacturer of patented bullet resistant products, is excited to announce the launch of the Mobile Safe Shield. The Mobile Safe Shield is a moveable bullet resistant shield that provides protection in the event of an assailant and supplies cover in the event of an active shooter. With a heavy-duty steel frame, quality castor wheels, and bullet resistant core, the Mobile Safe Shield is a perfect addition to any guard station, security desks, courthouses, police stations, schools, office spaces and more. The Mobile Safe Shield is incredibly customizable. Bullet resistant materials are available in UL 752 Levels 1 through 8 and include glass, white board, tack board, veneer, and plastic laminate. Flexibility in bullet resistant materials allows for the Mobile Safe Shield to blend more with current interior décor for a seamless design aesthetic. Optional custom paint colors are also available for the steel frame. 3

  • Automatic Systems V07

    Automatic Systems V07

    Automatic Systems, an industry-leading manufacturer of pedestrian and vehicle secure entrance control access systems, is pleased to announce the release of its groundbreaking V07 software. The V07 software update is designed specifically to address cybersecurity concerns and will ensure the integrity and confidentiality of Automatic Systems applications. With the new V07 software, updates will be delivered by means of an encrypted file. 3