Mostly Ignored Cybersecurity Collaboration is Becoming a Reality

Times have started changing for the better in the U.S. cybersecurity world. After years of minimal effort to get together to discuss cyberattacks and breaches and share some pertinent data, big companies and the federal government have finally started to collaborate on mitigating big cybersecurity issues.

This is a meaningful development in the mostly isolated arena of cybersecurity professionals -- one in which pros have long communicated only with colleagues and outsiders seldom intervened. But the recent start of serious collaboration is likely to strengthen collective resilience and reactions to potential threats -- and might significantly improve cybersecurity in America over time.

It’s a refreshing new concept similar to the concept of a “neighborhood watch.” In American neighborhoods, the idea is to observe and share criminal information, including the tactics and techniques of attackers, to recognize threats and better defend against them. Studies have shown that most areas associated with a neighborhood watch see crime drop.

There is no reason why a similar outcome can’t be achieved in cybersecurity. After all, a company that shares some of its cybersecurity information with outside organizations and teams is exposed to additional resources and expertise.

As an example, let’s say that an organization has recently expanded its transactional lines of business and in response faces a rapid uptick in fraud. Its anti-fraud team doesn’t yet possess the skills or manpower required to effectively combat the fraudulent schemes. By sharing information and collaborating with other organizations with better-established anti-fraud teams, this company can get more visibility into emerging schemes and guidance on how to shut them down.

For decades, companies and to a lesser extent the government have been very slow to share cybersecurity information. They were worried about legal implications, attacker retaliation, reputational damage or endangering intellectual property. But the number of cyberattacks has consistently escalated over the years despite ever-bigger cybersecurity budgets, and companies and the government have come to realize they can’t effectively fight many cyber-attacks solo. It helps, too, that important cybersecurity information can often be shared without actually revealing identities.

Big technology companies, in particular, are taking cybersecurity collaboration seriously, sparked, in part, by a meeting at The White House last summer in which CEOs in information technology and other industries made concrete promises to President Biden to take action. Google, for instance, said it would invest more than $10 billion over five years to strengthen cybersecurity and also pledged to train tens of thousands of Americans in security-related fields. IBM said it would train more than 150,000 people in cybersecurity skills in three years and also announced a new data storage solutions for critical infrastructure companies.

The groundwork for serious cooperation was probably laid in December 2020, when the devastating hack of network management company SolarWinds was divulged. An estimated 18,000 customers downloaded SolarWinds code containing malware, enabling bad actors to compromise many major companies and U.S. government agencies. It became apparent that business and government expose each other to significant cyber-risks because they are interconnected and rely on the same network of software vendors.

In addition, the cyber community finally conceded that U.S. technology infrastructure, including data centers and industrial control equipment, was mostly owned and operated by private companies acting on their own amid constantly evolving attacks. Underscoring the vulnerability of American players, ransomware breaches last year at giants Colonial Pipeline and JBS Foods undermined the availability of gasoline and food, respectively, in large swaths of the country.

The government and technology companies did make a few efforts in the past to stimulate cybersecurity collaboration, but they were unsuccessful, largely because participation was minimal.

Perhaps the most prominent step was The Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, the first major piece of Congressional legislation. It urged businesses and government agencies to share information about cybersecurity threats to better identify cyber-attacks and defend against them. But participation was voluntary and most technology companies declined to participate for privacy reasons. The legislation ultimately failed.

That lesson learned, here are three examples of renewed progress on the cybersecurity front:

  • The White House cybersecurity summit last August. Business leaders in total committed billions of dollars to strengthen cybersecurity in multiple ways. In addition to the plans cited by Google and IBM, there was also the biggest move of all by Microsoft – a $20 billion investment in cybersecurity advancements over the next five years. This included an expansion of Microsoft’s security training network and a commitment to help U.S. government agencies upgrade their digital security systems.
  • The announcement in October by White House Cyber Czar Chris Inglis of a new effort to protect both the public and private sectors. One effort underway is laying the groundwork for more cyber regulations in key industry sectors, including energy and transportation. Inglis is also working to move much of the government to a “zero-trust” model – the assumption that all computer network activity is malicious until users prove otherwise.
  • The National Security Agency also announced in October that more than 100 companies have joined a NSA effort to collaborate with industry on big cybersecurity problems. This includes a goal to speed the translation of intelligence about cyber threats into unclassified forms that can be more widely shared with industry. This is a huge about-face for the NSA, which for decades shunned such public efforts.

Featured

  • Gaining a Competitive Edge

    Ask most companies about their future technology plans and the answers will most likely include AI. Then ask how they plan to deploy it, and that is where the responses may start to vary. Every company has unique surveillance requirements that are based on market focus, scale, scope, risk tolerance, geographic area and, of course, budget. Those factors all play a role in deciding how to configure a surveillance system, and how to effectively implement technologies like AI. Read Now

  • 6 Ways Security Awareness Training Empowers Human Risk Management

    Organizations are realizing that their greatest vulnerability often comes from within – their own people. Human error remains a significant factor in cybersecurity breaches, making it imperative for organizations to address human risk effectively. As a result, security awareness training (SAT) has emerged as a cornerstone in this endeavor because it offers a multifaceted approach to managing human risk. Read Now

  • The Stage is Set

    The security industry spans the entire globe, with manufacturers, developers and suppliers on every continent (well, almost—sorry, Antarctica). That means when regulations pop up in one area, they often have a ripple effect that impacts the entire supply chain. Recent data privacy regulations like GDPR in Europe and CPRA in California made waves when they first went into effect, forcing businesses to change the way they approach data collection and storage to continue operating in those markets. Even highly specific regulations like the U.S.’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) can have international reverberations – and this growing volume of legislation has continued to affect global supply chains in a variety of different ways. Read Now

  • Access Control Technology

    As we move swiftly toward the end of 2024, the security industry is looking at the trends in play, what might be on the horizon, and how they will impact business opportunities and projections. Read Now

Featured Cybersecurity

Webinars

New Products

  • FEP GameChanger

    FEP GameChanger

    Paige Datacom Solutions Introduces Important and Innovative Cabling Products GameChanger Cable, a proven and patented solution that significantly exceeds the reach of traditional category cable will now have a FEP/FEP construction. 3

  • AC Nio

    AC Nio

    Aiphone, a leading international manufacturer of intercom, access control, and emergency communication products, has introduced the AC Nio, its access control management software, an important addition to its new line of access control solutions. 3

  • Camden CM-221 Series Switches

    Camden CM-221 Series Switches

    Camden Door Controls is pleased to announce that, in response to soaring customer demand, it has expanded its range of ValueWave™ no-touch switches to include a narrow (slimline) version with manual override. This override button is designed to provide additional assurance that the request to exit switch will open a door, even if the no-touch sensor fails to operate. This new slimline switch also features a heavy gauge stainless steel faceplate, a red/green illuminated light ring, and is IP65 rated, making it ideal for indoor or outdoor use as part of an automatic door or access control system. ValueWave™ no-touch switches are designed for easy installation and trouble-free service in high traffic applications. In addition to this narrow version, the CM-221 & CM-222 Series switches are available in a range of other models with single and double gang heavy-gauge stainless steel faceplates and include illuminated light rings. 3