Where Compliance Falls Short: Taking a Proactive Approach to Risk in the Healthcare Industry

Changes to our digital spaces in recent years have led to an increase in IT risk—especially in the healthcare space. With more digitization comes an increased number of risks. Nearly 85% of healthcare data breaches reported to the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) in 2022 were attributed to hacking and IT incidents, according to data from the HHS. With more determined threat actors wanting to exploit patient data, a proactive approach to seeing, understanding and acting on risk is vital to improving the effectiveness of security.

Most organizations think that compliance is the first step to protecting it, but this approach leaves healthcare institutions out of touch when it comes to the threat landscape. Information security leaders and chief information security officers (CISOs) at healthcare facilities need to get in front of the constantly evolving cyber threats that loom over not only their business, but their patient and client data too. Understanding where compliance falls short is vital to creating an agile and responsive risk management program that connects back to business strategy.

The Difference Between a Compliance-Based and Risk-Based Approach
While compliance and risk are two sides of the same coin, they are focused on different issues. Compliance is based on a framework of statutory, regulatory or contractual requirements that are either met or unmet. Risk is focused around managing uncertainty with processes designed to achieve positive business outcomes.

Compliance and risk management programs both help healthcare organizations maintain stability and integrity on multiple levels, which prevent risks to the organization’s legal liability, financial position, reputation and physical assets. Compliance is more prescriptive and results in a more tactical, check-the-box approach. Risk management is predictive, anticipating risks, and requires a strategic approach. While compliance is still the typical starting point in protecting an organization (often due to the fines and regulatory actions associated with noncompliance), focusing exclusively on compliance can leave businesses short-sighted and exposed to unseen risk.

Because the main focus of risk is managing uncertainty, it has specific processes designed to achieve positive business outcomes. This is especially relevant to healthcare. Cyberthreats have become a constant, and with threat actors greater in number and working more creatively to breach organizations, having a proactive approach to risk can make healthcare facilities more adaptable. Risk is measured on a continuum, and whether a risk is acceptable will vary depending on an organization’s risk appetite. Understanding where compliance falls short, and the need to shift from a compliance-based to risk-based approach is vital—and looking at how uncertainty is managed is a crucial step.

Why Traditional Compliance Can Be Inefficient
Compliance audits are point-in-time assessments that appraise the controls already implemented by the organization. The downfall of these assessments is that they don’t focus on how well the organization is protected in real time. When manual processes are involved, it takes too long to start an audit or assess a threat landscape. Oftentimes, by the time an assessment is complete, the data is outdated because of an infrastructure change, regulatory update or new vulnerabilities. A compliance-first approach is no longer adequate to reduce risk and ensure that patient data is secure.

According to the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives’ (CHIME) Digital Health Most Wired Survey, 40% of healthcare organizations still don’t have a dedicated CISO, down 12% from 2021. For those organizations without a CISO, they rely too often on managers and other employees to be vigilant regarding phishing attempts, HIPAA breaches and other compliance threats and violations. Healthcare leaders need to recognize that this kind of compliance isn’t forward-looking and can lead to significant gaps in security. To support this, budgets are growing for a risk-first approach, citing risk management as a business priority almost twice as often as compliance. Security leaders understand that compliance with rules and regulations rarely translates into value-generating business propositions without the addition of a long-range risk management strategy. Compliance often leads to some risk avoidance, but risk management can help healthcare facilities proactively navigate risk, especially in this demanding regulatory environment.

The Value of a Modern Risk-Management Solution
Selecting the right risk management approach is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Within the healthcare industry, businesses may need to focus on different aspects of patient data and security. With a modern risk management program, healthcare organizations can gain high-level insight into their compliance and risk postures and gain visibility into how compliance activities reduce both IT and cyber risk. Not only will this provide deeper insights into risk and compliance, but it will allow healthcare organizations to break down silos, eliminate gaps and reduce any potential or current blind spots. Healthcare organizations should also seek out solutions that report on risk in the context of specific business objectives—helping the C-suite and board understand its value to strategy.

A risk-management program can also include automating tasks associated with risk calculation, giving managers automatic alerts when risk increases. Not only will this reduce any manual errors associated with calculating risk—after all, according to a study by IBM, human error is the main cause of 95% of cyber security breaches—but it will also increase accuracy with automated, cross-object risk scoring. When making this change, it is essential to communicate the new value of risk management so that healthcare leaders can better understand it. This will help show them exactly where and how their investment into risk programs is making the most significant impact—while simultaneously freeing additional time to focus on other valuable hospital-wide objectives.

Cybersecurity leaders in healthcare can deliver better outcomes with less effort by transitioning from a compliance-centric approach to a risk-centric one. Putting cyber risk into business context by using a risk-centric approach allows healthcare CISOs and CIOs to connect risk to the business objectives prioritized by the C-suite and board. With visibility into the organization’s overall risk posture, leaders will have an accurate and relevant view into how their actions and investments are impacting business success.

Featured

Featured Cybersecurity

Webinars

New Products

  • Camden CM-221 Series Switches

    Camden CM-221 Series Switches

    Camden Door Controls is pleased to announce that, in response to soaring customer demand, it has expanded its range of ValueWave™ no-touch switches to include a narrow (slimline) version with manual override. This override button is designed to provide additional assurance that the request to exit switch will open a door, even if the no-touch sensor fails to operate. This new slimline switch also features a heavy gauge stainless steel faceplate, a red/green illuminated light ring, and is IP65 rated, making it ideal for indoor or outdoor use as part of an automatic door or access control system. ValueWave™ no-touch switches are designed for easy installation and trouble-free service in high traffic applications. In addition to this narrow version, the CM-221 & CM-222 Series switches are available in a range of other models with single and double gang heavy-gauge stainless steel faceplates and include illuminated light rings. 3

  • PE80 Series

    PE80 Series by SARGENT / ED4000/PED5000 Series by Corbin Russwin

    ASSA ABLOY, a global leader in access solutions, has announced the launch of two next generation exit devices from long-standing leaders in the premium exit device market: the PE80 Series by SARGENT and the PED4000/PED5000 Series by Corbin Russwin. These new exit devices boast industry-first features that are specifically designed to provide enhanced safety, security and convenience, setting new standards for exit solutions. The SARGENT PE80 and Corbin Russwin PED4000/PED5000 Series exit devices are engineered to meet the ever-evolving needs of modern buildings. Featuring the high strength, security and durability that ASSA ABLOY is known for, the new exit devices deliver several innovative, industry-first features in addition to elegant design finishes for every opening. 3

  • FEP GameChanger

    FEP GameChanger

    Paige Datacom Solutions Introduces Important and Innovative Cabling Products GameChanger Cable, a proven and patented solution that significantly exceeds the reach of traditional category cable will now have a FEP/FEP construction. 3