With All Due Respect to Political Correctness

A few weeks ago, I penned a thought on our Web site that body scanners have no place in an airport. I argued that they are invasive and unnecessary. I still feel that way, but if I have to walk through a body scanner, so should everyone else.

Some Muslim-Americans are now saying that body scanners violate Islamic law, and Muslim-American groups are supporting a “fatwa” -- a religious ruling -- that forbids Muslims from going through airport scanners. The alternative is a full-body pat down.

We’re all faced with walking through body scanners because extremist Muslims took advantage of a lax security screening system on Sept. 11, 2001, and again on Dec. 21, 2002, when shoe bomber Abdul Raheem (Richard Reid) tried to blow up an airplane. It happened again on Dec. 25, 2009, when underwear bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallub of Nigeria tried to bring down a Northwest Airlines jet.

Lest I forget, the Transportation Security Administration implemented their 3-1-1 ruling in 2006 after three terrorists where arrested for attempting to bring bomb-making materials on board a London to New York flight. All three have been convicted.

Muslim teachings tell men and women that to be seen naked by other people is a clear violation of Islamic teachings. Islam emphasizes modesty, and its followers consider it part of their faith. I agree and applaud Islam for such high moral values. No one wants the outline of their body, shown in graphic detail, to be seen by a law enforcement official.

The bottom line seems very simple to me. We are in this situation because 19 terrorists, who had been taking advantage of the goodness of America and its citizens, murdered more than 3,000 people by hijacking airplanes and flying them into the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon. These same cowards subscribe to jihad, or what they believe is a holy war, because of their religious beliefs. But then, not all Muslims believe jihad means violence.

The Fiqh Council of North America says that body scanners violate Islamic law. Last time I checked, Islamic law has no bearing or standard in the United States. But I still believe that body scanners are invasive to passengers, Muslim or not.

About the Author

Ralph C. Jensen is the Publisher/Editor in chief of Security Today magazine.

Featured

New Products

  • FEP GameChanger

    FEP GameChanger

    Paige Datacom Solutions Introduces Important and Innovative Cabling Products GameChanger Cable, a proven and patented solution that significantly exceeds the reach of traditional category cable will now have a FEP/FEP construction.

  • Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden Door Controls has relaunched its CV-7600 card readers in response to growing market demand for a more secure alternative to standard proximity credentials that can be easily cloned. CV-7600 readers support MIFARE DESFire EV1 & EV2 encryption technology credentials, making them virtually clone-proof and highly secure.

  • A8V MIND

    A8V MIND

    Hexagon’s Geosystems presents a portable version of its Accur8vision detection system. A rugged all-in-one solution, the A8V MIND (Mobile Intrusion Detection) is designed to provide flexible protection of critical outdoor infrastructure and objects. Hexagon’s Accur8vision is a volumetric detection system that employs LiDAR technology to safeguard entire areas. Whenever it detects movement in a specified zone, it automatically differentiates a threat from a nonthreat, and immediately notifies security staff if necessary. Person detection is carried out within a radius of 80 meters from this device. Connected remotely via a portable computer device, it enables remote surveillance and does not depend on security staff patrolling the area.