Alarm - Monitoring from the end user perspective

Alarm!

Monitoring from the end user perspective

We all look at monitoring from a different perspective. The consultant looks at it from a cost benefit analysis standpoint to represent the client’s best interest. Usually the consultant’s client is the end user that will have the most interaction with the monitoring service. The integrator looks at monitoring from a recurring revenue standpoint and in some cases the generator of service calls.

Let’s look at monitoring from the end user perspective. I find that the end user perspective is usually that first and last thing on integrators’ minds when signing them up for monitoring contracts. The end user is first on the integrator’s mind when getting a one-year or more service agreement signed that also includes the monitoring piece from a central station service provider.

However, the end user is last on the mind when thinking about the fact that from the signing of the contract forward most of the interaction with the central station is from the end user. If a false alarm is generated, the end user and the central station speak. If a real alarm is generated, the central station and the end user speak. If there is a change to the call list or telephone numbers or anything else regarding contact information, the end user and the central station speak. In fact, it is a forgotten topic in most integrators that during the recurring revenue period after installation the real relationship is between the end user and the central station.

I was a service manager for a large integrator back in my integrator days, and I was the solution to a lot of upset clients after they had a problem. The people that they trusted so much, the central station operators, now could not help them because they had a door replaced and didn’t realize they needed to move the door contact and magnet over to the new door.

Simple problem: if they were speaking to the integrator it would be easily solved with a quick service call. In fact, since the monitoring service, central station, answered the phone as our company name the end user had no idea that they were a thirdparty center and had no ability to assist with our service call. Arguments ensue and the end user gets angry and fires the integrator not ever knowing that the next integrator uses the same central station third-party service, so really nothing changed but the integrator.

End users build a trust and respect element based on interactions with the person on the other end of the phone during a false alarm, a real alarm, or a change in information. This trust gets built typically with the central station operators and as an integrator that uses third party central station services your main concern will be to not lose a seat at the table with that end user.

As an integrator a good way to “keep a seat at the end user’s table” is to provide life cycle management services that provide periodic contact with the end user. Good types of contacts would be to send customer satisfaction surveys, send system health monitoring reports, provide a cost free service call to check the battery or other elements prior to warranty expiration or service agreement period ending. These little contacts that are non-abrasive and customer service oriented end up providing the optimal customer service without being that person they end up regretting the calls from.

This article originally appeared in the April 2015 issue of Security Today.

About the Author

Charlie Howell is an independent security consultant in Northern California.

Featured

  • Evolving Cybersecurity Strategies: Uniting Human Risk Management and Security Awareness Training

    Organizations are increasingly turning their attention to human-focused security approaches, as two out of three (68%) cybersecurity incidents involve people. Threat actors are shifting from targeting networks and systems to hacking humans via social engineering methods, living off human errors as their most prevalent attack vector. Whether manipulated or not, human cyber behavior is leveraged to gain backdoor access into systems. This mainly results from a lack of employee training and awareness about evolving attack techniques employed by malign actors. Read Now

  • Report: 1 in 3 Easily Exploitable Vulnerabilities Found on Cloud Assets

    CyCognito recently released new research highlighting critical security vulnerabilities across cloud-hosted assets, revealing that one in three easily exploitable vulnerabilities or misconfigurations are found on cloud assets. As organizations increasingly shift to multi-cloud strategies, the findings underscore significant security gaps that could provide attackers with potential footholds into networks. Read Now

  • Built for Today, Ready for Tomorrow

    Selecting the right VMS is critical for any organization that depends on video surveillance to ensure safety, security and operational efficiency. While many organizations focus on immediate needs such as budget and deployment size, let us review some of the long-term considerations that can significantly impact a VMS's utility and flexibility. Read Now

  • Paving the Way to Smart Buildings

    In today's rapidly evolving security landscape, the convergence of on-prem, edge and cloud technologies are critical. The physical security landscape is undergoing a profound transformation, driven by the rapid digitalization of buildings and the evolving needs of modern organizations. As the buildings sector pivots towards smart, AI and data-driven operations, the integration of both edge and cloud technology has become crucial. Read Now

  • The Cybersecurity Time Bomb

    If you work in physical security, you have probably seen it: a camera, access control system, or intrusion detection device installed years ago, humming along without a single update. It is a common scenario that security professionals have come to accept as "normal." But here is the reality: this mindset is actively putting organizations at risk. Read Now

New Products

  • Unified VMS

    AxxonSoft introduces version 2.0 of the Axxon One VMS. The new release features integrations with various physical security systems, making Axxon One a unified VMS. Other enhancements include new AI video analytics and intelligent search functions, hardened cybersecurity, usability and performance improvements, and expanded cloud capabilities

  • A8V MIND

    A8V MIND

    Hexagon’s Geosystems presents a portable version of its Accur8vision detection system. A rugged all-in-one solution, the A8V MIND (Mobile Intrusion Detection) is designed to provide flexible protection of critical outdoor infrastructure and objects. Hexagon’s Accur8vision is a volumetric detection system that employs LiDAR technology to safeguard entire areas. Whenever it detects movement in a specified zone, it automatically differentiates a threat from a nonthreat, and immediately notifies security staff if necessary. Person detection is carried out within a radius of 80 meters from this device. Connected remotely via a portable computer device, it enables remote surveillance and does not depend on security staff patrolling the area.

  • AC Nio

    AC Nio

    Aiphone, a leading international manufacturer of intercom, access control, and emergency communication products, has introduced the AC Nio, its access control management software, an important addition to its new line of access control solutions.