Guide for Protecting your Company against Insider Threats

Guide for Protecting your Company against Insider Threats

Cybersecurity is mainly outward facing.  Most products like firewalls, anti-spam, and network intrusion devices are designed to keep hackers on the outside from getting in, but that outward approach does not address an equally dangerous situation: the insider threat.

A Profile of the Insider

There are two kinds of insider threats:  the malicious employee, contractor, or vendor and the unwitting victim of a hacker attack.  IBM in its 2016 Cyber Security Intelligence Index says that 60% of cyberattacks came from insiders.  Three-quarters of those were intentional.  Case in point - monitoring what goes on inside your network is just as important.

The employees to watch for are:

  • Disgruntled employees
  • Employees  with access to sensitive information that can be monetized
  • Phishing Victims
  • Employees who are just careless with regards to security

Below we show specific events that an employer should monitor in order to detect and prevent insider threats. Remember, every organization is different, so work backwards to understand what files and systems you want to protect and then check who has access. Many times, we’ve seen companies realize that an audit was never performed on user access and many more people than they thought had access to sensitive information.

Monitoring Employee Behavior - Behavior to Look Out For

Deleting Files. Employees delete files for many reasons, however, those files are company property and most likely could have been used at a future time. Additionally, deleting files in a system can cause structural IT damage. Alerts should be set for deleted files, based on seniority, access and file type.

Delete or Access Key Accounts. Not everyone needs access to everything. Sometimes in order to not inhibit particular work processes, employees are given access to files that are stored with other information not necessary for their tasks. When employees access files that do not pertain to their daily tasks and roles, the access should be recorded and depending on the sensitivity of the file, administrators may need to be alerted.

Copying data to a USB. It’s the easiest way to walk away with a chunk of data. All USB inserts and information copied to USB drives should be monitored.

Sending email to a competitor. We all know who’s hands we wouldn’t want our data to land in. Create a list of competitors and domains you would find suspicious if data was sent to from a work computer.

Printing confidential information. This can be dangerous for two reasons - one it’s easy for an employee to transfer data to a third party but it can also leave a client’s information just lying around the office for anyone to see.

Granting access. Some industry regulations, such as SOX and HIPAA, require that employers have a certification process. This is a formal, documented process for approving and granting employees access.  But certain individuals have access to grant themselves elevated access.  Or a person can get a hold of the credentials of an administrator.

Keyboard logging. Keyboard logging while popularly used by malicious users from the outside can also be a valuable tool for real-time alerting (for example if someone reached how to access blocked files) and even more helpful when doing IT forensic investigations to understand the full story.

Applications Used. Applications used should be monitored for two reasons. The first reason is because insider threats are more likely to use personal applications to transfer data. So if you see someone is logging into their g-mail account at work more than usual - that’s a red flag. Another reason is to compare one user’s application use to others within the department. If someone is consistently logging into applications that no one else in the department is using - that can be a red flag as well.

What  actions should be taken if users engage in high-risk behavior?
Each type of behavior needs to be given an appropriate risk level. For example, a very- high risk action could be putting company financials onto a USB drive while a low risk action could be copying an unreleased brochure to a USB drive. In many cases, if the action is low risk, its best to warn the user and notify them that their behavior could be of risk to the company. This has been proven as a good preventive measure from having the user repeat the action. If the behavior is deemed as high risk, blocking the action or locking the employee’s account is acceptable protocol.

After-the-Fact Forensics

While taking all the above preventive measures should keep your organization secure - employees can get creative. Logging employee actions is key to the after the fact investigation. Not only does it help you figure out what en employee has taken or deleted, but also the weak point in your security setup. Having this information allows you to protect yourself in the future. Additionally, the data can also be helpful in case of any legal action.

On the Need to be Secure

Looking out for and being able to track the aforementioned behavior allows employers and administrators to add an extra degree of security to their IT infrastructure. The amount of incidents surrounding insider threats is on the rise every year and still the majority of organizations haven’t put in the proper procedures to detect and prevent insider threats. Don’t let your organization get the bad rep from a data breach or have their IP stolen - start putting the proper measures in place today.


Featured

  • Video Surveillance Trends to Watch

    With more organizations adding newer capabilities to their surveillance systems, it’s always important to remember the “basics” of system configuration and deployment, as well as the topline benefits of continually emerging technologies like AI and the cloud. Read Now

  • New Report Reveals Top Trends Transforming Access Controller Technology

    Mercury Security, a provider in access control hardware and open platform solutions, has published its Trends in Access Controllers Report, based on a survey of over 450 security professionals across North America and Europe. The findings highlight the controller’s vital role in a physical access control system (PACS), where the device not only enforces access policies but also connects with readers to verify user credentials—ranging from ID badges to biometrics and mobile identities. With 72% of respondents identifying the controller as a critical or important factor in PACS design, the report underscores how the choice of controller platform has become a strategic decision for today’s security leaders. Read Now

  • Overwhelming Majority of CISOs Anticipate Surge in Cyber Attacks Over the Next Three Years

    An overwhelming 98% of chief information security officers (CISOs) expect a surge in cyber attacks over the next three years as organizations face an increasingly complex and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven digital threat landscape. This is according to new research conducted among 300 CISOs, chief information officers (CIOs), and senior IT professionals by CSC1, the leading provider of enterprise-class domain and domain name system (DNS) security. Read Now

  • ASIS International Introduces New ANSI-Approved Investigations Standard

    • Guard Services
  • Cloud Security Alliance Brings AI-Assisted Auditing to Cloud Computing

    The Cloud Security Alliance (CSA), the world’s leading organization dedicated to defining standards, certifications, and best practices to help ensure a secure cloud computing environment, today introduced an innovative addition to its suite of Security, Trust, Assurance and Risk (STAR) Registry assessments with the launch of Valid-AI-ted, an AI-powered, automated validation system. The new tool provides an automated quality check of assurance information of STAR Level 1 self-assessments using state-of-the-art LLM technology. Read Now

New Products

  • Camden CM-221 Series Switches

    Camden CM-221 Series Switches

    Camden Door Controls is pleased to announce that, in response to soaring customer demand, it has expanded its range of ValueWave™ no-touch switches to include a narrow (slimline) version with manual override. This override button is designed to provide additional assurance that the request to exit switch will open a door, even if the no-touch sensor fails to operate. This new slimline switch also features a heavy gauge stainless steel faceplate, a red/green illuminated light ring, and is IP65 rated, making it ideal for indoor or outdoor use as part of an automatic door or access control system. ValueWave™ no-touch switches are designed for easy installation and trouble-free service in high traffic applications. In addition to this narrow version, the CM-221 & CM-222 Series switches are available in a range of other models with single and double gang heavy-gauge stainless steel faceplates and include illuminated light rings.

  • Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden Door Controls has relaunched its CV-7600 card readers in response to growing market demand for a more secure alternative to standard proximity credentials that can be easily cloned. CV-7600 readers support MIFARE DESFire EV1 & EV2 encryption technology credentials, making them virtually clone-proof and highly secure.

  • Automatic Systems V07

    Automatic Systems V07

    Automatic Systems, an industry-leading manufacturer of pedestrian and vehicle secure entrance control access systems, is pleased to announce the release of its groundbreaking V07 software. The V07 software update is designed specifically to address cybersecurity concerns and will ensure the integrity and confidentiality of Automatic Systems applications. With the new V07 software, updates will be delivered by means of an encrypted file.