Vivint Will Pay $20 Million Penalty, Compensation to Customers

Vivint Will Pay $20 Million Penalty, Compensation to Customers

Vivint has agreed to pay a $20 million settlement from allegations that the company failed to use credit reports properly to help unqualified customers to obtain financing for products and services.

The terms of the settlement from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) will break up the fine with $15 million paid as a civil penalty; the remaining $5 million will be used as compensation to affected customers. This is the largest settlement to date for a Fair Credit Reporting Act case.

The FTC filed the complaint, which implied that some Vivint staff were using the credit reports in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act., and that Vivint had violated FTC’s Red Flags Rule for failure to implement an identity theft prevention program. This program is required by certain companies that regularly use of seek a credit report.

The claim made by FTC is that Vivint sales staff used a process known as “white paging.” This method helps a sales person find a consumer name or a similar name in the White Pages app to use their history and qualify that prospective client for financing. Many Vivint sales rep work door-to-door, and when the sales team finds a potential client by this means, they asked customers to provide the names of relatives or someone else they might know who had better credit as a co-signer on the account without that person’s permission. If the customer then defaulted, Vivint allegedly referred the innocent party to a debt buyer. According to FTC, Vivint knew of this problem and even fired a number of sales staff, but rehired them shortly thereafter.

“Vivint’s sales staff stole people’s personal information to approve others for loans,” said Daniel Kaufman, Acting Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “For misusing consumer credit reports and other sensitive data, and harming people’s credit, this company will pay $20 million.”

In addition to the monetary judgment—the largest to date for an FTC FCRA case—the settlement requires Vivint to implement an employee monitoring and training program, as well as an identity theft prevention program. The company must also establish a customer service task force to verify that accounts belong to the right customer before referring any account to a debt collector, and must assist consumers who were improperly referred to debt collectors.
“We are pleased to have resolved this matter related to certain historical practices. We had already taken steps before the FTC began its review to strengthen our compliance policies, and will continue to make this a focus going forward. We are deeply committed to operating with integrity and delivering exceptional service to our customers,” according to a company spokesperson.
In addition, Vivint must obtain biennial assessments by an independent third party to ensure the company is complying with the FCRA. Vivint is also prohibited from engaging in the types of improper conduct detailed in the complaint.
People who did not sign up for Vivint’s services but were contacted by debt collectors or found Vivint accounts improperly listed on their credit reports may be eligible for compensation from this settlement should contact FTC.

“Vivint’s misconduct harmed its actual customers and the unsuspecting individuals whose identities were stolen. They need help fixing their credit reports, fending off debt buyers and debt collectors seeking payments for debt they don’t owe, and obtaining compensation for these financial harms,” said FTC Commissioner Rohit Chopra. “The Commission has requested that the Attorney General charge Vivint with violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act and for selling fake debts. I believe the Commission should have also alleged that the company violated the FTC Act’s prohibitions on deceptive practices by falsifying credit applications. I also believe that Vivint turned a blind eye to obvious compliance failures by its sales force, which violated the FTC Act’s prohibition on unfair practices.”

Oddly enough, Vivint was named as Business Intelligence Group’s 2021 Excellence in Customer Service Award. The business awards program recognizes companies that are providing a differentiated level of customer service.

“Vivint is in the business of providing peace of mind, particularly during challenging times,” said David Porter, senior vice president of Customer Excellence at Vivint. “Customer obsession is a core company value at Vivint. This award recognizes our commitment to provide our customers the highest levels of service and support as we protect their homes and families.”

  • The Z-Wave Alliance Focuses on the Residential Market The Z-Wave Alliance Focuses on the Residential Market

    Mitchell Klein serves as the executive director of the Z-Wave Alliance, an industry organization that drives numerous initiatives to expand and accelerate the global adoption of smart home and smart cities applications. In this Podcast, we talk about the 2022 State of the Ecosystem, and the fact that technology has brought about almost unimaginable residential security resources. The Alliance also provides education resources as well as looking at expanding technology.

Digital Edition

  • Security Today Magazine - May June 2022

    May / June 2022


    • The Ying and Yang of Security
    • Installing Smart Systems
    • Leveraging Surveillance
    • Using Mobile Data
    • RIP Covid-19

    View This Issue

  • Environmental Protection
  • Occupational Health & Safety
  • Infrastructure Solutions Group
  • Spaces4Learning
  • Campus Security & Life Safety