Clicking Through the Cloudy Relationship Between US Feds and Google

Clicking Through the Cloudy Relationship Between US Feds and Google

Clicking Through the Cloudy Relationship Between US Feds and GoogleOn September 5, 2013, Google asked a federal judge to dismiss a class action lawsuit against Google Gmail, stating electronically scanning the content of emails has been “ordinary business practices” since Gmail’s inception. The lawsuit, originally filed in May 2013, accuses Google of illegally opening and reading emails in violation of California's privacy laws and federal wiretapping statutes.

“This company reads, on a daily basis, every email that's submitted, and when I say read, I mean looking at every word to determine meaning,” Texas attorney Sean Rommel, who is co-counsel for plaintiffs suing Google, told the Associated Press. He further stated, “Data could be used for more than just targeting advertising, although the parts of the lawsuit discussing what more Google might be doing with private information is currently under seal.”

Turns out Google is an ECS provider. For those who aren’t familiar with those letters, ECS is the abbreviation for Enhanced Cybersecurity Services—a “voluntary information sharing program” operating from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and to thwart “unauthorized access, exploitation or data exfiltration.” DHS works with other federal cybersecurity organizations “to gain access to a broad range of sensitive and classified cyber threat information.”

One such federal cybersecurity organization likely involves the National Security Agency (NSA). In fact, Google reached out to the NSA in 2010 after allegedly hacked by China. In a 2010 article posted by Wired and sourcing The Washington Post, the China hack may have been a smokescreen used by Google to justify its relationship with NSA. Executive Director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, Marc Rotenberg told Wired, “What they’ve told you is that this is about an investigation of a hack involving China. I think and have good reason to believe that there’s a lot more going on.”

Google’s relationship with NSA remains cloudy (no pun intended). A 2011 report by Consumer Watchdog discloses millions of dollars paid to Google through contracts by various U.S. government agencies, including NASA, the FCC and the Justice Department’s DEA. In 2012, Google received a $35 million contract to run the U.S. Department of Interior.

Ironically, The Washington Post reported September 7, 2013, which was two days after Google released its Motion to Dismiss the Gmail lawsuit that Google was “racing to encrypt the torrents information that flow among its data centers” against government snoops, which include the NSA. “Google’s encryption initiative…was accelerated in June as the tech giant struggled to guard its reputation as a reliable steward of user information amid controversy about the NSA’s PRISM program, first reported in The Washington Post and the Guardian [June, 2013]. PRISM obtains data from American technology companies, including Google, under various legal authorities.”

The Post further reported, “Communications between services—when an e-mail, for example, is sent from a user of Gmail to a user of Microsoft’s Outlook mail—are not generally encrypted, appearing to surveillance systems as what experts call ‘clear text.’”

Eric Grosse, vice president for security engineering at Google, told The Post that Google resists government surveillance. “This is just a point of personal honor,” Grosse said. “It will not happen here.”

Really?

Perhaps the great irony is the Internet giant that earns billions from information delivery doesn’t seem to understand the importance of timing and basic public relations.

Photo Credited to Annette Shaff / Shutterstock.com.

Featured

  • Gaining a Competitive Edge

    Ask most companies about their future technology plans and the answers will most likely include AI. Then ask how they plan to deploy it, and that is where the responses may start to vary. Every company has unique surveillance requirements that are based on market focus, scale, scope, risk tolerance, geographic area and, of course, budget. Those factors all play a role in deciding how to configure a surveillance system, and how to effectively implement technologies like AI. Read Now

  • 6 Ways Security Awareness Training Empowers Human Risk Management

    Organizations are realizing that their greatest vulnerability often comes from within – their own people. Human error remains a significant factor in cybersecurity breaches, making it imperative for organizations to address human risk effectively. As a result, security awareness training (SAT) has emerged as a cornerstone in this endeavor because it offers a multifaceted approach to managing human risk. Read Now

  • The Stage is Set

    The security industry spans the entire globe, with manufacturers, developers and suppliers on every continent (well, almost—sorry, Antarctica). That means when regulations pop up in one area, they often have a ripple effect that impacts the entire supply chain. Recent data privacy regulations like GDPR in Europe and CPRA in California made waves when they first went into effect, forcing businesses to change the way they approach data collection and storage to continue operating in those markets. Even highly specific regulations like the U.S.’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) can have international reverberations – and this growing volume of legislation has continued to affect global supply chains in a variety of different ways. Read Now

  • Access Control Technology

    As we move swiftly toward the end of 2024, the security industry is looking at the trends in play, what might be on the horizon, and how they will impact business opportunities and projections. Read Now

Featured Cybersecurity

Webinars

New Products

  • EasyGate SPT and SPD

    EasyGate SPT SPD

    Security solutions do not have to be ordinary, let alone unattractive. Having renewed their best-selling speed gates, Cominfo has once again demonstrated their Art of Security philosophy in practice — and confirmed their position as an industry-leading manufacturers of premium speed gates and turnstiles. 3

  • Mobile Safe Shield

    Mobile Safe Shield

    SafeWood Designs, Inc., a manufacturer of patented bullet resistant products, is excited to announce the launch of the Mobile Safe Shield. The Mobile Safe Shield is a moveable bullet resistant shield that provides protection in the event of an assailant and supplies cover in the event of an active shooter. With a heavy-duty steel frame, quality castor wheels, and bullet resistant core, the Mobile Safe Shield is a perfect addition to any guard station, security desks, courthouses, police stations, schools, office spaces and more. The Mobile Safe Shield is incredibly customizable. Bullet resistant materials are available in UL 752 Levels 1 through 8 and include glass, white board, tack board, veneer, and plastic laminate. Flexibility in bullet resistant materials allows for the Mobile Safe Shield to blend more with current interior décor for a seamless design aesthetic. Optional custom paint colors are also available for the steel frame. 3

  • Connect ONE’s powerful cloud-hosted management platform provides the means to tailor lockdowns and emergency mass notifications throughout a facility – while simultaneously alerting occupants to hazards or next steps, like evacuation.

    Connect ONE®

    Connect ONE’s powerful cloud-hosted management platform provides the means to tailor lockdowns and emergency mass notifications throughout a facility – while simultaneously alerting occupants to hazards or next steps, like evacuation. 3