Not All Drone Detectors are Created Equally

Not All Drone Detectors are Created Equally

How the Boston Marathon could have been better protected from drones

On a recent Monday morning, about 1 million spectators and 30,000 runners participated in the Boston Marathon, two years after the bombing tragedy that impacted so many people’s lives. An article from BostonHerald.com titled, “Commissioner: ‘No threats out there’ for race,” mentioned that the city had deployed a number of extra security measures, and one of those was the use of about 10 drone-detection units.

Protecting people from drones is a forward-thinking initiative for public security and is absolutely the right thing to do. Perhaps the detectors made people feel a bit more protected from a variety of amorphous threats, too. Unfortunately, the reality is that Boston’s drone-detection was less effective than it might have been. Let’s take a look at the situation.

The system DroneShield deployed uses audio detection—very similar to gunshot- detection systems that have been used in a number of large metropolitan areas. These normally provide suitable validation because there are many of these systems around, but detecting a drone is different and much more difficult. Gunshot detectors are focused specifically on the loud, sharp report of a shot—this is extremely loud and very simple to hear—a single pulse of sound.

Drones, however, are much more complex. Drones are quiet compared to a gunshot—most of them are visually and audibly noticeable within a few feet, but that drops off quickly as they get further away. The noise they make is so variable that each type of drone has a unique signature, and the drones themselves change their sound depending on whether they’re hovering, moving or even if their propeller blades get worn or nicked.

Hearing the drone is just part of the challenge—recognizing it in a noisy environment is almost impossible. Computer programs exist that are adept at matching sounds against audio patterns—this is how YouTube is able to detect unlicensed songs automatically on its site. But in those cases, the audio track is the only sound and is therefore isolated; if there are other sounds mixed in, it becomes more difficult to make a match.

For example, if you listen to a YouTube video in which someone is in public and a song can be heard mixed in with the regular day-to-day noise, you’ll likely find the song isn’t tagged—its audio is different enough that the pattern the software is looking for doesn’t match. This same problem exists when detecting drones in locations with plenty of ambient noise.

This weakness is noted by DroneShield’s founder, Brian Hearing, who says he’s eager to see how effectively the sensors filter out crowd and other noises.

He’ll be lucky to have heard anything but a clash of noises.

What about once the drone is detected? The DroneShield system comes with net guns that were given to police officers—the same types that scientists often use to capture birds for tagging. This seems like a great idea, except the range of the nets are generally 50 feet or less. Drones have to essentially be stationary and quite close to the officer to be caught.

Finally, how do cities go about protecting the public from malicious drones, and why do we care?

“We are detection experts and we take our job very seriously,” Hearing said. “We know how the various types of drone detectors work and don’t work. We have spent a great deal of time on this and, full disclosure, we sell a product called Drone Detector.

“Ours is a system that leverages multiple methods to detect if a drone is in use and, if so, what information can be determined about it. We use audio, too, but we amplify the detector’s ability by adding radio frequency and GPS location services so we can spot a drone lots further out—roughly 400 meters. Once we find the drone, we can find the operator.”

As drones change and evolve, people will need to continually assess detection systems to ensure that they work as effectively as possible. We encourage everyone interested in this space to do competitive evaluations and determine what works most efficaciously in their area and for their specific needs.

This article originally appeared in the June 2015 issue of Security Today.

About the Authors

Phil Wheat is a co-founder and CTO of Drone-Shield.

Zain Naboulsi is a co-founder, and is the CEO of DroneShield.

Featured

  • Just as Expected

    GSX produced a wonderful tradeshow earlier this week. Monday was surprisingly strong in the morning, and the afternoon wasn’t bad at all. That’s Monday’s results and asking attendees to travel on Sunday. Just a quick hint, no one wants to give up their weekend to travel and set up an exhibit booth. I’m just saying. Read Now

    • Industry Events
    • GSX
  • NOLA: The Crescent City

    Twenty years later we finds ourselves in New Orleans. Twenty years ago the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina forced exhibitors and attendees to look elsewhere for tradeshow floor space. Read Now

    • Industry Events
    • GSX
  • Nothing Artificial About this Intelligence

    I have been looking forward to this year’s GSX show in New Orleans, the Cresent City, or if you prefer The Big Easy. It seems like quite a while since we’ve been here. Twenty years ago, ASIS, as it was known then was literally washed out of the city by someone known as Katrina. It is a good thing to come back to NOLA. Read Now

  • From Monitors to Mission Control

    Security Operations Centers (SOC) were once defined by rows of static monitors, each displaying a single feed with operators quietly watching for issues. That model has become obsolete. Incidents evolve too quickly, data comes from multiple locations, and decisions must be made in seconds—not minutes. Read Now

  • New Gas Monkey Garage Venue Uses AI-Enhanced Video Technology

    Gas Monkey Garage, the automotive custom shop and entertainment brand founded by Richard Rawlings of Fast N’ Loud TV fame, has opened a vibrant new restaurant and bar in South Dakota, equipped with advanced, AI-enhanced video tech from IDIS Americas. Read Now

New Products

  • AC Nio

    AC Nio

    Aiphone, a leading international manufacturer of intercom, access control, and emergency communication products, has introduced the AC Nio, its access control management software, an important addition to its new line of access control solutions.

  • Compact IP Video Intercom

    Viking’s X-205 Series of intercoms provide HD IP video and two-way voice communication - all wrapped up in an attractive compact chassis.

  • Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden Door Controls has relaunched its CV-7600 card readers in response to growing market demand for a more secure alternative to standard proximity credentials that can be easily cloned. CV-7600 readers support MIFARE DESFire EV1 & EV2 encryption technology credentials, making them virtually clone-proof and highly secure.