Industry Focus

School Teacher Expelled

You have to wonder what is happening on school campuses these days. Why some students act the way they do; why some turn to violence.

Over the years there has been one tragic campus incident report after another: Someone entering a school campus, going into a classroom and causing harm and destruction. To put it bluntly, young people have been killed for no reason.

There is an enormous focus on the safety and security of the campus, the students, staff and teachers. Then, something like this happens:

In Nevada (Nuh-VA-duh), Texas, sits Community Independent School District (CISD). The district is located in the southeast portion of Collin County, and is about 30 miles northeast of Dallas. The growth of this area has been substantial over the past few years. CISD comprises the towns of Copeville, Josephine, Lavon and Nevada, and understandably, citizens take great pride in their schools.

At McClendon Elementary School, a teacher was suspended after locking a student out of her classroom that was allegedly threatening to kill her. Students in the classroom, said the student outside “kept banging on the door and yelling at us. I was worried but I wasn’t crying, most of the kids were crying.”

For locking the classroom door, Fourth Grade teacher Judy Stough was suspended.

Mike Sheperd, CISD school board president, said this after refusing the opportunity for an interview. “The safety of our staff and students remains a priority and please understand that it is our practice to maintain confidentially in matters regarding CISD staff and students.” I get the safety concept quite well, and, of course, there should be some degree of confidentiality. However, if the outcome were different, we would all know what really happened by now, and where the weak link is.

I would suggest that Judy Stough is a very strong link, and was protecting her students. Apparently, the young man standing outside the classroom has a history of causing problems, and in this case, banging on the classroom door, and shouting the he was “going to [expletive] kill,’ the teacher doesn’t set very well for me.

Critics of locking the door said the teacher should have walked the student down to the office to visit with administrators. I think that if someone threatens to kill you, you don’t walk them down to the office. You call for help, which is what Stough did, but no one in the office picked up the phone.

Parents in the school district have praised Stough for protecting her students from this boy. School officials apparently disagreed because a suspension was handed out pretty quickly for what school officials said was “escalating the incident” when her students said quite the opposite.

Students interviewed on local television said the teacher handled the situation exactly how she should have handled it. The next day, some parents kept their children home, and they will stay at home until the teacher is reinstated and the problem student is removed. Of course, holding a student from school probably isn’t the answer, but parent Connie Wilson said, “I would just rather pay truancy and make sure she’s safe than send her to school and let her get hurt.”Apparently Stough sent out a couple of text messages to other teachers, the messages reading, “Scares the hell out of my kids. One about to pee her pants.”

In a phone call to acting superintendent Jeff Chambers a few days later, he said that it is the district’s policy not to talk about personnel matters. “However, all students are safe, and at no time during this incident were any students at risk.” Of course they weren’t at risk; Stough locked the door.

Stough was quick thinking enough to lock the door and seek help. She took her job seriously enough to protect her students. We’ve seen the other side of the coin all too often when a student resorts to violence. It is then, after an incident, which people are saying, “If we had done this, or that.…” Too late then.

Parents of students at McClendon Elementary have had communications with the district administration in a closed door meeting. The outcome of this meeting is apparently secret because no one is talking. Stough declined a request for an interview.

Connie Miller Maestas Wilson wrote on her Facebook page that the meeting was worthless. “They gave us nothing but empty promises, and guarantees. They would not promise us that this child that threatened to kill our children would not be in the school when they start counting our children absent.”

Jimmy Dyess, another parent within the district, said, “I think it [the meeting] was a lot of rhetoric and lies.”

This seems like a pretty easy call to me. Stough protected her students from what seemed like potential harm. If somebody said they were going to kill you, wouldn’t you take that threat pretty serious? I sure would.

This article originally appeared in the July 2015 issue of Security Today.

Featured

  • Security Today Announces 2025 CyberSecured Award Winners

    Security Today is pleased to announce the 2025 CyberSecured Awards winners. Sixteen companies are being recognized this year for their network products and other cybersecurity initiatives that secure our world today. Read Now

  • Empowering and Securing a Mobile Workforce

    What happens when technology lets you work anywhere – but exposes you to security threats everywhere? This is the reality of modern work. No longer tethered to desks, work happens everywhere – in the office, from home, on the road, and in countless locations in between. Read Now

  • TSA Introduces New $45 Fee Option for Travelers Without REAL ID Starting February 1

    The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) announced today that it will refer all passengers who do not present an acceptable form of ID and still want to fly an option to pay a $45 fee to use a modernized alternative identity verification system, TSA Confirm.ID, to establish identity at security checkpoints beginning on February 1, 2026. Read Now

  • The Evolution of IP Camera Intelligence

    As the 30th anniversary of the IP camera approaches in 2026, it is worth reflecting on how far we have come. The first network camera, launched in 1996, delivered one frame every 17 seconds—not impressive by today’s standards, but groundbreaking at the time. It did something that no analog system could: transmit video over a standard IP network. Read Now

  • From Surveillance to Intelligence

    Years ago, it would have been significantly more expensive to run an analytic like that — requiring a custom-built solution with burdensome infrastructure demands — but modern edge devices have made it accessible to everyone. It also saves time, which is a critical factor if a missing child is involved. Video compression technology has played a critical role as well. Over the years, significant advancements have been made in video coding standards — including H.263, MPEG formats, and H.264—alongside compression optimization technologies developed by IP video manufacturers to improve efficiency without sacrificing quality. The open-source AV1 codec developed by the Alliance for Open Media—a consortium including Google, Netflix, Microsoft, Amazon and others — is already the preferred decoder for cloud-based applications, and is quickly becoming the standard for video compression of all types. Read Now

New Products

  • A8V MIND

    A8V MIND

    Hexagon’s Geosystems presents a portable version of its Accur8vision detection system. A rugged all-in-one solution, the A8V MIND (Mobile Intrusion Detection) is designed to provide flexible protection of critical outdoor infrastructure and objects. Hexagon’s Accur8vision is a volumetric detection system that employs LiDAR technology to safeguard entire areas. Whenever it detects movement in a specified zone, it automatically differentiates a threat from a nonthreat, and immediately notifies security staff if necessary. Person detection is carried out within a radius of 80 meters from this device. Connected remotely via a portable computer device, it enables remote surveillance and does not depend on security staff patrolling the area.

  • Mobile Safe Shield

    Mobile Safe Shield

    SafeWood Designs, Inc., a manufacturer of patented bullet resistant products, is excited to announce the launch of the Mobile Safe Shield. The Mobile Safe Shield is a moveable bullet resistant shield that provides protection in the event of an assailant and supplies cover in the event of an active shooter. With a heavy-duty steel frame, quality castor wheels, and bullet resistant core, the Mobile Safe Shield is a perfect addition to any guard station, security desks, courthouses, police stations, schools, office spaces and more. The Mobile Safe Shield is incredibly customizable. Bullet resistant materials are available in UL 752 Levels 1 through 8 and include glass, white board, tack board, veneer, and plastic laminate. Flexibility in bullet resistant materials allows for the Mobile Safe Shield to blend more with current interior décor for a seamless design aesthetic. Optional custom paint colors are also available for the steel frame.

  • ResponderLink

    ResponderLink

    Shooter Detection Systems (SDS), an Alarm.com company and a global leader in gunshot detection solutions, has introduced ResponderLink, a groundbreaking new 911 notification service for gunshot events. ResponderLink completes the circle from detection to 911 notification to first responder awareness, giving law enforcement enhanced situational intelligence they urgently need to save lives. Integrating SDS’s proven gunshot detection system with Noonlight’s SendPolice platform, ResponderLink is the first solution to automatically deliver real-time gunshot detection data to 911 call centers and first responders. When shots are detected, the 911 dispatching center, also known as the Public Safety Answering Point or PSAP, is contacted based on the gunfire location, enabling faster initiation of life-saving emergency protocols.