While these topics may seem somewhat disparate, there is actually a common thread amongst them: They all have security officers and end users concerned.

Single Sign-On and a Secure Portal

Over the last several years, some of the most common security articles have concerned passwords, potential hacking of accounts, data security and cloud applications. While these topics may seem somewhat disparate, there is actually a common thread among them: They all have security officers and end users concerned.

So how do we start to address the concerns and limit the vulnerability? The combination of single sign-on (SSO) with a secure portal and multi-factor authentication just may be the answer to the majority of the concerns. The number of credentials that an end user must remember to login into personal and work-related applications has most definitely exceeded the average person’s ability to remember them without some crutch. That may be writing them down on a sticky note, storing them in a plain text file or using the same set across multiple systems. The advent of SSO and password manager technology has greatly alleviated the need for these non-secure password storage/use methods. End users only need to remember the single set of credentials (one user name and password combination) to access the SSO login, and access to all authorized applications are automated as the SSO caches or remembers the apps for everything else.

The common concern with this approach has been if that one set of credentials is stolen or compromised, a nefarious individual now has the keys to the kingdom and can wreak havoc on the organization’s information and steal sensitive data. The most common approach to secure that one master key had been two-factor authentication (2FA). By using a form of 2FA – biometrics, fingerprint, keystroke recognition, PIN code, etc. – it is possible to secure the single password with something that only the real user would have.

Also, newer technology has evolved in the form of software enforced security and can be utilized with or without 2FA to make the use of the password even more secure. By introducing a secure portal, which becomes the only avenue that users can access their applications, it is possible to set further restrictions. These restrictions can include IP ranges, on/off company network, time of day, device type and location. Enhancing these measure even further, they can be defined per application, group or individual.

Let’s take a look at a quick example: John Smith works in the finance department as an accounts payable controller. He accesses the financial application only from inside the network between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. from his desktop PC. However, he accesses email anywhere from 7 p.m. to 11 p.m. from either his PC or his smartphone. Using a combination of the restrictions, the finance application can be restricted to a PC with a specific IP on the network, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. while the email supplication can be accessed from the PC or an iOS smartphone with a specific MAC address on any network between 7 a.m. and 11 p.m. If someone were to gain access by hacking John’s password, they would not be able to access the finance application if they were physically on John’s desktop nor would they be able to access the email if they did not have John’s iOS device.

Combining the access rules with 2FA, such as biometrics, safeguards the single password needed to access the secure portal even more so. By locking down the access to especially sensitive applications to time of day, device, IP and network, it is completely feasible to minimize the risk associate with the SSO credential. The result is a happier employee -- as he or she now only needs to recall one set of user credentials -- and a happier security officer as they can be assured that access is tightly controlled.

Until the much-touted, ultimate demise of the password occurs, the best an organization can do is implement as many security fences around applications as possible and secure the password itself with either two- or multi-factor authentication.

Featured

  • From Surveillance to Intelligence

    Years ago, it would have been significantly more expensive to run an analytic like that — requiring a custom-built solution with burdensome infrastructure demands — but modern edge devices have made it accessible to everyone. It also saves time, which is a critical factor if a missing child is involved. Video compression technology has played a critical role as well. Over the years, significant advancements have been made in video coding standards — including H.263, MPEG formats, and H.264—alongside compression optimization technologies developed by IP video manufacturers to improve efficiency without sacrificing quality. The open-source AV1 codec developed by the Alliance for Open Media—a consortium including Google, Netflix, Microsoft, Amazon and others — is already the preferred decoder for cloud-based applications, and is quickly becoming the standard for video compression of all types. Read Now

  • Cost: Reactive vs. Proactive Security

    Security breaches often happen despite the availability of tools to prevent them. To combat this problem, the industry is shifting from reactive correction to proactive protection. This article will examine why so many security leaders have realized they must “lead before the breach” – not after. Read Now

  • Achieving Clear Audio

    In today’s ever-changing world of security and risk management, effective communication via an intercom and door entry communication system is a critical communication tool to keep a facility’s staff, visitors and vendors safe. Read Now

  • Beyond Apps: Access Control for Today’s Residents

    The modern resident lives in an app-saturated world. From banking to grocery delivery, fitness tracking to ridesharing, nearly every service demands another download. But when it comes to accessing the place you live, most people do not want to clutter their phone with yet another app, especially if its only purpose is to open a door. Read Now

  • Survey: 48 Percent of Worshippers Feel Less Safe Attending In-Person Services

    Almost half (48%) of those who attend religious services say they feel less safe attending in-person due to rising acts of violence at places of worship. In fact, 39% report these safety concerns have led them to change how often they attend in-person services, according to new research from Verkada conducted online by The Harris Poll among 1,123 U.S. adults who attend a religious service or event at least once a month. Read Now

New Products

  • PE80 Series

    PE80 Series by SARGENT / ED4000/PED5000 Series by Corbin Russwin

    ASSA ABLOY, a global leader in access solutions, has announced the launch of two next generation exit devices from long-standing leaders in the premium exit device market: the PE80 Series by SARGENT and the PED4000/PED5000 Series by Corbin Russwin. These new exit devices boast industry-first features that are specifically designed to provide enhanced safety, security and convenience, setting new standards for exit solutions. The SARGENT PE80 and Corbin Russwin PED4000/PED5000 Series exit devices are engineered to meet the ever-evolving needs of modern buildings. Featuring the high strength, security and durability that ASSA ABLOY is known for, the new exit devices deliver several innovative, industry-first features in addition to elegant design finishes for every opening.

  • 4K Video Decoder

    3xLOGIC’s VH-DECODER-4K is perfect for use in organizations of all sizes in diverse vertical sectors such as retail, leisure and hospitality, education and commercial premises.

  • A8V MIND

    A8V MIND

    Hexagon’s Geosystems presents a portable version of its Accur8vision detection system. A rugged all-in-one solution, the A8V MIND (Mobile Intrusion Detection) is designed to provide flexible protection of critical outdoor infrastructure and objects. Hexagon’s Accur8vision is a volumetric detection system that employs LiDAR technology to safeguard entire areas. Whenever it detects movement in a specified zone, it automatically differentiates a threat from a nonthreat, and immediately notifies security staff if necessary. Person detection is carried out within a radius of 80 meters from this device. Connected remotely via a portable computer device, it enables remote surveillance and does not depend on security staff patrolling the area.