The Complexity of Mass Notification

The Complexity of Mass Notification

When there is a crisis on campus, no matter where the student is at that time, it is imperative that he or she be notified of impending danger. Without a well-planned mass notification system, coupled with proper procedures, the campus opens itself up to legal liability and financial exposure as well as potentially bad PR.

To better understand what is needed and the current state of mass notifications, Siemens undertook a detailed analysis of U.S. colleges and universities, taking a hard look at information provided to the government as part of the Clery Act. The company released the results in October in a white paper.

The Clery Act is a federal mandate requiring all institutions of higher education that participate in federal financial aid to disclose information about crime on their campuses and in surrounding communities.

“A multitude of communications tools are available today to instantaneously and simultaneously send messages and alerts to large groups of people. However, no one tool is capable of reaching everyone at once. Comprehensive, multi-modal mass notification systems that incorporate various layers of messaging and are managed from a single command center are the most effective way to reach the maximum number of people and ensure consistency of message,” the Siemens white paper stated.

Public and private colleges and universities are affected by the mandates of the Clery Act, and failure to comply can result in fines and sanctions on the federal level. In 2010, there were 77 Clery Reports filed, coming from 34 private, 31 public and 12 community colleges in each region of the United States. Enrollments also ranged from 1,000 to as many as 100,000 students.

The report seemed to indicate that community colleges are least likely to implement a layered, emergency notification system, with 75 percent of the community colleges ranking at level 1 or 2. Level 1 is a rudimentary system with the most simplistic emergency notification capabilities, generally consisting of a nonlayered approach with less than three modalities in one or two categories. Level 2 is multi-dimensional where a non-layered approach to emergency communications incorporates between four and six different modalities in one or two categories.

The categories include:

  • At your side. The use of SMS/text, e-mail, voicemail, call-in emergency hotline, university website, internal portal or blog.
  • Inside. Use of a public address system, digital signage, desktop alerting, tone alert radios, voice-enabled fire alarm panels or posted notices.
  • Outside. Outdoor public address system, warning sirens, mobile loud-speakers on vehicles, blue light towers and outdoor emergency phones.
  • Extended. Social media, such as Facebook, Twitter and others, and CCTV.

Sixty-one percent of public universities ranked as a level 3 or 4, with several modes of communication that can easily and effectively reach students, faculty, staff, administrators and visitors. Only one public school was rated as a level 1, relying on SMS/ text, e-mail and voicemail to communicate with those people on campus. All remaining schools used between four to 12 notification modalities on campus.

There also appears to be a direct correlation between size of campus and the sophistication of the mass notification system. Bigger schools generally have more complex notification systems in place. Private schools are about right in the middle of the road with their implementation of notification systems. Of those schools analyzed, 70 percent were rated as Level 2 or 3, meaning they had moderately sophisticated systems in place.

The highest level of sophistication was found in southern states with the largest number of schools rating Level 4 of any region. The South also had the most mature mass notification systems in place; and 29 percent of the schools in the region used a layered approach that includes all modes in all four categories. Nearly half of the schools use Twitter and Facebook to communicate during emergencies.

“School enrollments range from 1,000 to upwards of 100,000 students at the college and university campuses reviewed in the study. Not surprisingly, there appears to be a direct correlation between the size of the school and the sophistication of the mass notification systems in use,” the study noted.

“Among the schools analyzed, those with enrollments of more than 8,000 students are more likely to have multi-layered notification systems. Twenty-one percent of universities in this category ranked as Level 4, as compared to only 10 percent of schools with less than 8,000 students enrolled,” the study concluded.

Digital signage seemed to be less prevalent on college campuses, though 77 percent of the colleges and universities in the study indicated the use of outdoor systems to alert people on campus of an imminent threat. The most widely used outdoor modality is the blue light/outdoor emergency phones, which are available on 60 percent of campuses reviewed. Nearly 25 percent of all campuses reviewed use an outdoor warning siren and public address systems.

Universities and colleges have a wide array of options that can be used for communication at each of their communities during an emergency. Few of the campuses actually demonstrated the type of comprehensive, multi-layered system that is critical to reach the masses when there is a crisis. The most widespread method is the Web-based alerting system as well as short message services, texts, mass e-mails, voicemail blasts, website postings and the use of social media. These all work well, but they have to be turned on, and if any factor such as a power failure or a wireless network failure arises, the message won’t be delivered.

The security and safety of students, faculty and staff is of the utmost importance. The right protocols and technology must be in place to be effective and provide the ability to communicate with everyone.

This article originally appeared in the December 2011 issue of Security Today.


  • Cloud Adoption Gives Way to Hybrid Deployments

    Cloud adoption is growing at an astonishing rate, with Gartner forecasting that worldwide public cloud end-user spending will approach $600 billion by the end of this year—an increase of more than 21% over 2022. McKinsey believes that number could eclipse $1 trillion by the end of the decade, further underscoring the industry’s exponential growth. Read Now

  • AI on the Edge

    Discussions about the merits (or misgivings) around AI (artificial intelligence) are everywhere. In fact, you’d be hard-pressed to find an article or product literature without mention of it in our industry. If you’re not using AI by now in some capacity, congratulations may be in order since most people are using it in some form daily even without realizing it. Read Now

  • Securing the Future

    In an increasingly turbulent world, chief security officers (CSOs) are facing a multitude of challenges that threaten the stability of businesses worldwide. Read Now

    • Guard Services
  • Security Entrances Move to Center Stage

    Most organizations want to show a friendly face to the public. In today’s world, however, the need to keep people safe and secure has become a prime directive when designing and building facilities of all kinds. Fortunately, there is no need to construct a fortress-like entry that provides that high level of security. Today’s secured entry solutions make it possible to create a welcoming, attractive look and feel at the entry without compromising security. It is for this reason that security entrances have moved to the mainstream. Read Now

Featured Cybersecurity

New Products

  • Connect ONE’s powerful cloud-hosted management platform provides the means to tailor lockdowns and emergency mass notifications throughout a facility – while simultaneously alerting occupants to hazards or next steps, like evacuation.

    Connect ONE®

    Connect ONE’s powerful cloud-hosted management platform provides the means to tailor lockdowns and emergency mass notifications throughout a facility – while simultaneously alerting occupants to hazards or next steps, like evacuation. 3

  • Mobile Safe Shield

    Mobile Safe Shield

    SafeWood Designs, Inc., a manufacturer of patented bullet resistant products, is excited to announce the launch of the Mobile Safe Shield. The Mobile Safe Shield is a moveable bullet resistant shield that provides protection in the event of an assailant and supplies cover in the event of an active shooter. With a heavy-duty steel frame, quality castor wheels, and bullet resistant core, the Mobile Safe Shield is a perfect addition to any guard station, security desks, courthouses, police stations, schools, office spaces and more. The Mobile Safe Shield is incredibly customizable. Bullet resistant materials are available in UL 752 Levels 1 through 8 and include glass, white board, tack board, veneer, and plastic laminate. Flexibility in bullet resistant materials allows for the Mobile Safe Shield to blend more with current interior décor for a seamless design aesthetic. Optional custom paint colors are also available for the steel frame. 3

  • Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden Door Controls has relaunched its CV-7600 card readers in response to growing market demand for a more secure alternative to standard proximity credentials that can be easily cloned. CV-7600 readers support MIFARE DESFire EV1 & EV2 encryption technology credentials, making them virtually clone-proof and highly secure. 3