Detecting And Mitigating

Detecting And Mitigating

Search for the key that will minimize risk

Insider threat has become an increasingly prevalent concern for organizations, and the damage from breaches caused by current or former employees, contractors or partners misusing access credentials can be devastating.

Despite the very real risk, many organizations are not certain whether the policies and processes they employ, such as candidate screening and background checks, are adequate for identifying potential problems. While they recognize the risk presented by insider threat, they may not be confident in their ability to detect, or what solutions are the most effective for prevention. Some organizations may also be hesitant to monitor employees for insider threat for fear of causing dissatisfaction or interfering with their ability to perform their jobs. That type of thinking may well lead to negative repercussions at some point.

They say that the first step in solving any problem is to understand that there’s a problem in the first place, which bodes well given the recognition of the need for protection from insider threat. It is the next steps—understanding what constitutes insider threat, prevention, detection and response—that merit further discussion.

UNDERSTANDING INSIDER THREAT

Insider threat or attack covers a full spectrum of actions, ranging from wide-scale catastrophic incidents to those that are less severe but still damaging in some way. Most notably are the high-profile, well-publicized attacks like the Sony breach, which was found to have been the result of insider attack because trusted credentials were used. But while these breaches can be devastating, not all insider threat is as obvious. It might be as simple as a sales rep who takes an account list when leaving a job, a programmer who takes a piece of proprietary code, or even an employee who deletes important emails prior to resigning. Given the complex psychology that plays into these and other threats, it can be difficult to understand, let alone mitigate or avoid potential problems.

Here are three key factors in addressing and mitigating insider threat, along with best practices for effectively accomplishing each.

PREVENTION

The first step in addressing insider threat is prevention, which begins with a formalized program to address the issue. To do this, organizations must develop strong policies or revisit those already in place using enterprise-wide risk assessments to consider threats from insiders and trusted business partners.

In addition to policies, organizations must also have a strong understanding of the assets and locations that must be protected, as well as the risk level associated with each. For example, data centers and control rooms would be labeled as the highest priority for protection, while office supply rooms could lie on the opposite end.

Credentialing is another major part of prevention. Badges must be issued with access privileges that are specific to each individual, department and/or job title. The most diligent approach organizations can employ when approaching insider threat prevention is the “least privilege” concept. Enforcing a strict separation of duties among employees ensures each individual is given the lowest level of access needed to perform their jobs, making it impossible for employees to use their credentials to enter areas or access assets that should be available only to management or security staff.

Effective prevention measures include periodic security training for employees. Focused training can help them understand that insider threat prevention is a risk that everyone in the organization shares and employees are being entrusted with this responsibility as part of the team. The right training and awareness program can help employees see security as a provider of services that eases access requests and other processes with automation. Once they can view security as a positive, employees become a valuable part of detection, which is the second – and often most challenging – factor in mitigating insider threat.

DETECTION

The main key to detection is to implement strong metrics for measuring usage and identifying potential problems. Along with metrics, it is important to institute stringent access controls and monitoring policies to develop and rank potential risk factors that will help focus ongoing activities. There are a number of ways organizations can accomplish these goals, including passively monitoring for misused credentials or monitoring and responding to suspicious or disruptive behavior.

Analysis of credential usage helps establish employees’ typical patterns. Any action outside of that norm will flag the system of a potential insider threat, which can then be monitored to determine if that is the case or whether there is a harmless explanation for this deviation. If the threat is real, security can work to avoid it altogether.

Employees can play a major role in effective insider threat detection but getting them to participate can be difficult if they feel like they’re being watched or that they aren’t trusted. A good first step is to initiate regular security training and make clear that any reporting is confidential. When people feel like a trusted member of the team, they are more willing to participate in the “if you see something, say something” aspect of detection.

RESPONSE

The final step in mitigating insider threats is to develop a strong, comprehensive plan for responding to incidents. The goal of response is to ensure swift follow-up with the most appropriate actions by the security team.

Effective response requires linking data generated by access and other systems to individuals’ actions, which must be actively monitored and audited to generate real-time awareness of emerging threats. There are automated solutions that monitor and audit these systems for anomalies and correlate them with other data.

Once data has been reviewed, raising the issue of atypical access patterns with an employee can be sensitive. After someone attempts to access an unauthorized area, security might send an email asking the employee if they need access to that area. Proactively de-escalating the situation helps prevent honest employees from feeling attacked. For those who may be planning or considering insider theft or other action, it is a warning.

For handling the worst-case scenario where an insider breach has already occurred, organizations must develop a comprehensive employee termination procedure that includes deactivating credentials to remove access privileges immediately. Simply knowing insider threat is a problem is not enough without concrete policies and procedures in place to mitigate or avoid these types of breaches. By implementing best practices to ensure effective prevention, detection and response, organizations can ensure not only that they are actively working to prevent these threats, but also that employees are willing to become an extension of the security team, helping to prevent potentially devastating consequences.

This article originally appeared in the January 2017 issue of Security Today.

Featured

  • Video Surveillance Trends to Watch

    With more organizations adding newer capabilities to their surveillance systems, it’s always important to remember the “basics” of system configuration and deployment, as well as the topline benefits of continually emerging technologies like AI and the cloud. Read Now

  • New Report Reveals Top Trends Transforming Access Controller Technology

    Mercury Security, a provider in access control hardware and open platform solutions, has published its Trends in Access Controllers Report, based on a survey of over 450 security professionals across North America and Europe. The findings highlight the controller’s vital role in a physical access control system (PACS), where the device not only enforces access policies but also connects with readers to verify user credentials—ranging from ID badges to biometrics and mobile identities. With 72% of respondents identifying the controller as a critical or important factor in PACS design, the report underscores how the choice of controller platform has become a strategic decision for today’s security leaders. Read Now

  • Overwhelming Majority of CISOs Anticipate Surge in Cyber Attacks Over the Next Three Years

    An overwhelming 98% of chief information security officers (CISOs) expect a surge in cyber attacks over the next three years as organizations face an increasingly complex and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven digital threat landscape. This is according to new research conducted among 300 CISOs, chief information officers (CIOs), and senior IT professionals by CSC1, the leading provider of enterprise-class domain and domain name system (DNS) security. Read Now

  • ASIS International Introduces New ANSI-Approved Investigations Standard

    • Guard Services
  • Cloud Security Alliance Brings AI-Assisted Auditing to Cloud Computing

    The Cloud Security Alliance (CSA), the world’s leading organization dedicated to defining standards, certifications, and best practices to help ensure a secure cloud computing environment, today introduced an innovative addition to its suite of Security, Trust, Assurance and Risk (STAR) Registry assessments with the launch of Valid-AI-ted, an AI-powered, automated validation system. The new tool provides an automated quality check of assurance information of STAR Level 1 self-assessments using state-of-the-art LLM technology. Read Now

New Products

  • A8V MIND

    A8V MIND

    Hexagon’s Geosystems presents a portable version of its Accur8vision detection system. A rugged all-in-one solution, the A8V MIND (Mobile Intrusion Detection) is designed to provide flexible protection of critical outdoor infrastructure and objects. Hexagon’s Accur8vision is a volumetric detection system that employs LiDAR technology to safeguard entire areas. Whenever it detects movement in a specified zone, it automatically differentiates a threat from a nonthreat, and immediately notifies security staff if necessary. Person detection is carried out within a radius of 80 meters from this device. Connected remotely via a portable computer device, it enables remote surveillance and does not depend on security staff patrolling the area.

  • Luma x20

    Luma x20

    Snap One has announced its popular Luma x20 family of surveillance products now offers even greater security and privacy for home and business owners across the globe by giving them full control over integrators’ system access to view live and recorded video. According to Snap One Product Manager Derek Webb, the new “customer handoff” feature provides enhanced user control after initial installation, allowing the owners to have total privacy while also making it easy to reinstate integrator access when maintenance or assistance is required. This new feature is now available to all Luma x20 users globally. “The Luma x20 family of surveillance solutions provides excellent image and audio capture, and with the new customer handoff feature, it now offers absolute privacy for camera feeds and recordings,” Webb said. “With notifications and integrator access controlled through the powerful OvrC remote system management platform, it’s easy for integrators to give their clients full control of their footage and then to get temporary access from the client for any troubleshooting needs.”

  • HD2055 Modular Barricade

    Delta Scientific’s electric HD2055 modular shallow foundation barricade is tested to ASTM M50/P1 with negative penetration from the vehicle upon impact. With a shallow foundation of only 24 inches, the HD2055 can be installed without worrying about buried power lines and other below grade obstructions. The modular make-up of the barrier also allows you to cover wider roadways by adding additional modules to the system. The HD2055 boasts an Emergency Fast Operation of 1.5 seconds giving the guard ample time to deploy under a high threat situation.