Microsoft Is Wrong About SMS-Based Two-factor Authentication

Microsoft wants everyone to stop using SMS-based authentication. Their cybersecurity heart is in the right place but their logic is wrong. SMS-based two-factor authentication (2FA) is convenient, fast, doesn't require any additional apps and has a very low learning curve. They are correct in saying that it is flawed, but not for the reasons they think.

Microsoft's (and everyone else's) fundamental flaw in the argument against using SMS as the two-factor authentication method is that they are only considering SMS messages sent TO the phone. Those messages are inherently insecure for a variety of reasons. SMS messages by definition aren't secure because the codes are sent in clear text. Moreover, codes can appear on a phone's preview screen even when locked. In addition, having to enter a code on a web page introduces the potential for man in the middle (MITM) attack in addition to the hijacking of the inbound SMS.

However, like most other critics of SMS-based authentication they're missing a fundamental side of the equation: Phones work in both directions. Sending a code in a text FROM a phone is vastly more secure than sending one TO a phone. SMS authentication messages sent from phones are less vulnerable to hacking for a variety of reasons - but mostly for one big one that carriers implemented long ago.

Every phone has a unique "fingerprint" comprised of a combination of its IMEI (a kind of serial number for mobile devices) and the phone number assigned to it. Messages sent to carrier-sanctioned “short codes” cannot be spoofed to appear as though they come from another number. Why? Carriers prevented that long ago in order to stop two phones from using the same number, which would cost them money. The IMEI/phone number (the "fingerprint") matching process stops messages sent from a phone attempting to spoof a phone number because the number won't match the IMEI in the carrier's registration records. The result is that a mobile-originated 2FA message would never even reach the authentication server, thus eliminating any possibility of a false authentication.

The phone's "fingerprint" virtually eliminates any hacking when sending an authentication message via SMS. Add to this two additional factors and it becomes clear that this method is significantly superior to the current SMS 2FA method: First, man-in-the-middle attacks are completely eliminated (there's no web page into which a code must be entered). Second, sending an authentication text from a stolen phone is almost impossible because the phone has to be unlocked in order to send a text message.

The text-TO-phone SMS 2FA method is flawed in many ways but text-FROM-phone is not. Let's not throw the SMS-2FA-baby out with the authentication bath water.

About the Author

Scott Goldman is the CEO of TextPower, Inc.

Featured

  • Maximizing Your Security Budget This Year

    Perimeter Security Standards for Multi-Site Businesses

    When you run or own a business that has multiple locations, it is important to set clear perimeter security standards. By doing this, it allows you to assess and mitigate any potential threats or risks at each site or location efficiently and effectively. Read Now

  • New Research Shows a Continuing Increase in Ransomware Victims

    GuidePoint Security recently announced the release of GuidePoint Research and Intelligence Team’s (GRIT) Q1 2024 Ransomware Report. In addition to revealing a nearly 20% year-over-year increase in the number of ransomware victims, the GRIT Q1 2024 Ransomware Report observes major shifts in the behavioral patterns of ransomware groups following law enforcement activity – including the continued targeting of previously “off-limits” organizations and industries, such as emergency hospitals. Read Now

  • OpenAI's GPT-4 Is Capable of Autonomously Exploiting Zero-Day Vulnerabilities

    According to a new study from four computer scientists at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, OpenAI’s paid chatbot, GPT-4, is capable of autonomously exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities without any human assistance. Read Now

  • Getting in Someone’s Face

    There was a time, not so long ago, when the tradeshow industry must have thought COVID-19 might wipe out face-to-face meetings. It sure seemed that way about three years ago. Read Now

    • Industry Events
    • ISC West

Featured Cybersecurity

Webinars

New Products

  • EasyGate SPT and SPD

    EasyGate SPT SPD

    Security solutions do not have to be ordinary, let alone unattractive. Having renewed their best-selling speed gates, Cominfo has once again demonstrated their Art of Security philosophy in practice — and confirmed their position as an industry-leading manufacturers of premium speed gates and turnstiles. 3

  • Camden CM-221 Series Switches

    Camden CM-221 Series Switches

    Camden Door Controls is pleased to announce that, in response to soaring customer demand, it has expanded its range of ValueWave™ no-touch switches to include a narrow (slimline) version with manual override. This override button is designed to provide additional assurance that the request to exit switch will open a door, even if the no-touch sensor fails to operate. This new slimline switch also features a heavy gauge stainless steel faceplate, a red/green illuminated light ring, and is IP65 rated, making it ideal for indoor or outdoor use as part of an automatic door or access control system. ValueWave™ no-touch switches are designed for easy installation and trouble-free service in high traffic applications. In addition to this narrow version, the CM-221 & CM-222 Series switches are available in a range of other models with single and double gang heavy-gauge stainless steel faceplates and include illuminated light rings. 3

  • Compact IP Video Intercom

    Viking’s X-205 Series of intercoms provide HD IP video and two-way voice communication - all wrapped up in an attractive compact chassis. 3