ACLU logo

ACLU Sues Justice Department, FBI For Records Showing Agencies’ Use of Facial Recognition Software

The ACLU’s lawsuit is the most recent development in a growing debate over regulation of facial recognition use by law enforcement.

  • By Haley Samsel
  • Nov 01, 2019

In the latest escalation of the debate over law enforcement use of facial recognition technology, the American Civil Liberties Union sued the Justice Department, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the FBI on Thursday for records showing how the agencies use facial recognition software.

Arguing that the government has secretly rolled out a surveillance technology program without regulation or public knowledge, a group of ACLU attorneys asked a federal court in Massachusetts to force the agencies to release a number of documents regarding their use of the software.

That information includes how the government uses and audits the software, how officials communicate with security companies providing facial recognition capabilities and what internal guidelines that the agencies follow.

“Production of these records is important to assist the public in understanding the government’s use of highly invasive biometric identification and tracking technologies,” the attorneys wrote in their complaint. “These technologies have the potential to enable undetectable, persistent, and suspicionless surveillance on an unprecedented scale.”

The attorneys added that the surveillance system could permit the government to track people’s movements and associations in “ways that threaten core constitutional values.” The ACLU has been at the forefront in criticizing the accuracy and widespread use of facial recognition software, supporting efforts in California and across the country to ban its use by police departments, government agencies and private companies.

As of now, the FBI has access to more than 640 million facial photos, many of which are collected from state driver’s license databases, in a searchable database. More than 390,000 facial recognition searches have been recorded by local, state and federal investigators since 2011, The Washington Post reported.

The complaint was filed after federal agencies did not respond to records requests filed by the ACLU in January under the Freedom of Information Act, according to the attorneys.

Kade Crockford, the director of the ACLU of Massachusetts Technology for Liberty Project, wrote in a blog post that the group’s concerns about facial recognition range from its higher rates of inaccuracy in identifying people of color to the government’s lack of answers about how it decides to use the tech to identify crime suspects.

“This dystopian surveillance technology threatens to fundamentally alter our free society into one where we’re treated as suspects to be tracked and monitored by the government 24/7," Crockford wrote. 

Officials representing law enforcement groups and security companies have urged regulation over outright bans of the technology. In the past month, several industry groups and police organizations sent letters to Congressional representatives outlining the history of facial recognition and potential areas for regulation, including civil liberties protections.

Regulation from Congress may be coming soon. Democratic representatives have already introduced legislation banning biometric technology from federal public housing, and the late Rep. Elijah Cummings had led several hearings about the topic earlier this year.

About the Author

Haley Samsel is an Associate Content Editor for the Infrastructure Solutions Group at 1105 Media.

Featured

  • The Evolution of IP Camera Intelligence

    As the 30th anniversary of the IP camera approaches in 2026, it is worth reflecting on how far we have come. The first network camera, launched in 1996, delivered one frame every 17 seconds—not impressive by today’s standards, but groundbreaking at the time. It did something that no analog system could: transmit video over a standard IP network. Read Now

  • From Surveillance to Intelligence

    Years ago, it would have been significantly more expensive to run an analytic like that — requiring a custom-built solution with burdensome infrastructure demands — but modern edge devices have made it accessible to everyone. It also saves time, which is a critical factor if a missing child is involved. Video compression technology has played a critical role as well. Over the years, significant advancements have been made in video coding standards — including H.263, MPEG formats, and H.264—alongside compression optimization technologies developed by IP video manufacturers to improve efficiency without sacrificing quality. The open-source AV1 codec developed by the Alliance for Open Media—a consortium including Google, Netflix, Microsoft, Amazon and others — is already the preferred decoder for cloud-based applications, and is quickly becoming the standard for video compression of all types. Read Now

  • Cost: Reactive vs. Proactive Security

    Security breaches often happen despite the availability of tools to prevent them. To combat this problem, the industry is shifting from reactive correction to proactive protection. This article will examine why so many security leaders have realized they must “lead before the breach” – not after. Read Now

  • Achieving Clear Audio

    In today’s ever-changing world of security and risk management, effective communication via an intercom and door entry communication system is a critical communication tool to keep a facility’s staff, visitors and vendors safe. Read Now

  • Beyond Apps: Access Control for Today’s Residents

    The modern resident lives in an app-saturated world. From banking to grocery delivery, fitness tracking to ridesharing, nearly every service demands another download. But when it comes to accessing the place you live, most people do not want to clutter their phone with yet another app, especially if its only purpose is to open a door. Read Now

Most   Popular

New Products

  • Luma x20

    Luma x20

    Snap One has announced its popular Luma x20 family of surveillance products now offers even greater security and privacy for home and business owners across the globe by giving them full control over integrators’ system access to view live and recorded video. According to Snap One Product Manager Derek Webb, the new “customer handoff” feature provides enhanced user control after initial installation, allowing the owners to have total privacy while also making it easy to reinstate integrator access when maintenance or assistance is required. This new feature is now available to all Luma x20 users globally. “The Luma x20 family of surveillance solutions provides excellent image and audio capture, and with the new customer handoff feature, it now offers absolute privacy for camera feeds and recordings,” Webb said. “With notifications and integrator access controlled through the powerful OvrC remote system management platform, it’s easy for integrators to give their clients full control of their footage and then to get temporary access from the client for any troubleshooting needs.”

  • Compact IP Video Intercom

    Viking’s X-205 Series of intercoms provide HD IP video and two-way voice communication - all wrapped up in an attractive compact chassis.

  • Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden CV-7600 High Security Card Readers

    Camden Door Controls has relaunched its CV-7600 card readers in response to growing market demand for a more secure alternative to standard proximity credentials that can be easily cloned. CV-7600 readers support MIFARE DESFire EV1 & EV2 encryption technology credentials, making them virtually clone-proof and highly secure.