camera with facial recognition software

Security Industry, Police Groups Urge Congress Not to Ban Facial Recognition Technology

A coalition sent a letter to Congress asking members to consider alternatives to banning facial recognition, including the development of best practices and additional training.

As the fight over the use of facial recognition by police and security companies heats up, a group of 39 law enforcement groups and tech companies are urging Congress to consider regulating the technology rather than banning it outright. 


In an open letter to members of Congress released on Thursday, the coalition of industry groups, nonprofits and companies defended facial recognition as a useful tool to protect communities. The letter acknowledges growing calls for lawmakers to pass bans that would keep police and other groups from using the software, which academic researchers have found to be less accurate in identifying people of color and women. 

 

Several cities, including San Francisco and Oakland, have already passed law enforcement bans, and members of Congress have introduced a bill that would ban the tech from federally-funded public housing. Most recently, the California state legislature voted to ban facial recognition from police body cameras, though it could potentially be used on other cameras. 

 

Read More: Lawmakers Seek to Ban Biometric Recognition Technology in Public Housing


The signees of the letter, which include companies HID Global and IRIS ID Systems as well as the Security Industry Association (SIA), say these actions are a mistake. 


“While we agree that it is important to have effective oversight and accountability of these tools to uphold and protect civil liberties, we disagree that a ban is the best option to move forward,” the letter reads. “Bans would keep this important tool out of the hands of law enforcement officers, making it harder for them to do their jobs efficiently, stay safe, and protect our communities.”


The letter suggests that members of Congress consider other “viable alternatives” to bans, including the expansion of testing and performance standards, the development of best practices for law enforcement, and additional training for different uses of the technology. In addition, the coalition pointed to a study from the Pew Research Center that found a majority of Americans trust law enforcement to use facial recognition responsibly. 


Companies involved in developing facial recognition have been open to regulation in the past. Just last week, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos said that his company has been working on its own regulations to pitch to lawmakers. 


Amazon’s own facial recognition product, Rekognition, has been the subject of controversy in the past, with the Orlando police department dropping its partnership with Amazon after the technology failed to work. (The retail giant was not part of the Thursday letter). 


“The companies that stand to profit from the sale of facial recognition should not be writing the laws that govern it,” said Evan Greer, deputy director of digital rights group Fight for the Future, told The Seattle Times following the release of the letter. “And we should be skeptical of claims from law enforcement agencies that have a long track record of abusing their existing surveillance tools to target marginalized people and crack down on dissent.”


The coalition said that there are many individuals from law enforcement, academia, civil society and the security industry ready to work on regulations and determine the right path for the development of facial recognition. 


“We encourage you to continue to work with these experts to find solutions and compromises that will allow law enforcement agencies to adopt and test this important technology with appropriate oversight,” the letter reads. 

Featured

  • Paving the Way to Smart Buildings

    In today's rapidly evolving security landscape, the convergence of on-prem, edge and cloud technologies are critical. The physical security landscape is undergoing a profound transformation, driven by the rapid digitalization of buildings and the evolving needs of modern organizations. As the buildings sector pivots towards smart, AI and data-driven operations, the integration of both edge and cloud technology has become crucial. Read Now

  • The Cybersecurity Time Bomb

    If you work in physical security, you have probably seen it: a camera, access control system, or intrusion detection device installed years ago, humming along without a single update. It is a common scenario that security professionals have come to accept as "normal." But here is the reality: this mindset is actively putting organizations at risk. Read Now

  • Deploying in a Hybrid, Cloud Environment

    The way organizations manage access control is evolving. Traditional on-premises systems come with high IT and server requirements. At the same time, fully cloud-based solutions may not meet the needs of every facility. Read Now

  • Facing Facts for Facilities

    Despite the proliferation of constantly evolving security solutions, there remains a troubling trend among many facility operators who often neglect the most important security assets within their organization. Keys and shared devices like radios, laptops and tablets are crucial to successful operations, yet many operators are managing them haphazardly through outdated storage systems like pegboards and notebooks. Read Now

  • Report Reveals Security Training Reduces Global Phishing Click Rates by 86%

    KnowBe4, the cybersecurity platform that comprehensively addresses human risk management, today launched its “Phishing by Industry Benchmarking Report 2025” which measures an organization’s Phish-prone Percentage (PPP) — the percentage of employees likely to fall for social engineering or phishing attacks, indicating the organization’s overall susceptibility to phishing threats. This year’s report found a global average baseline PPP of 33.1%, meaning a third of employees interact with phishing simulations before taking part in best-practice security awareness training (SAT).COVER 2025-PIB-NA-Report_EN-US Read Now

New Products

  • PE80 Series

    PE80 Series by SARGENT / ED4000/PED5000 Series by Corbin Russwin

    ASSA ABLOY, a global leader in access solutions, has announced the launch of two next generation exit devices from long-standing leaders in the premium exit device market: the PE80 Series by SARGENT and the PED4000/PED5000 Series by Corbin Russwin. These new exit devices boast industry-first features that are specifically designed to provide enhanced safety, security and convenience, setting new standards for exit solutions. The SARGENT PE80 and Corbin Russwin PED4000/PED5000 Series exit devices are engineered to meet the ever-evolving needs of modern buildings. Featuring the high strength, security and durability that ASSA ABLOY is known for, the new exit devices deliver several innovative, industry-first features in addition to elegant design finishes for every opening.

  • Connect ONE’s powerful cloud-hosted management platform provides the means to tailor lockdowns and emergency mass notifications throughout a facility – while simultaneously alerting occupants to hazards or next steps, like evacuation.

    Connect ONE®

    Connect ONE’s powerful cloud-hosted management platform provides the means to tailor lockdowns and emergency mass notifications throughout a facility – while simultaneously alerting occupants to hazards or next steps, like evacuation.

  • AC Nio

    AC Nio

    Aiphone, a leading international manufacturer of intercom, access control, and emergency communication products, has introduced the AC Nio, its access control management software, an important addition to its new line of access control solutions.